As Denver Post business correspondent Aldo Svaldi reports, the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce is moving to resurrect of the major failed priorities from this year’s legislative session–a measure asking voters for more revenue to deal with the growing backlog of badly needed transportation projects all over the state of Colorado:
The Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce will pursue a ballot initiative next year to boost state transportation funding after the state legislature failed to send voters a measure to raise $3.5 billion for roads and transit this year…
Brough, in an interview after the announcement, said specifics are still being worked on with several other groups, but she hinted that the size and scope of the hard-fought but failed House Bill 1242 offers a starting point.
…The bill, sponsored by Democratic House Speaker Crisanta Duran and Republican Senate President Kevin Grantham, sought to increase the statewide sales tax to 3.52 percent from 2.9 percent for 20 years to raise $3.5 billion for transportation funding.
But Senate conservatives, opposed in principle to tax increases and state spending priorities, contributed to the bill’s demise late in the session, ending what backers had hailed as a grand bargain between Republicans and Democrats to address a critical need.
The state’s two principal right-wing ideological hard line groups, Americans for Prosperity-Colorado and the Independence Institute–who were chiefly responsible for killing the bipartisan “grand bargain” between Democratic House Speaker Crisanta Duran and GOP Senate President Kevin Grantham–reacted with predictable anger:
BREAKING: Den Chamber refuses to pressure #coleg to act on fixing our roads w/o a tax hike (that will lose). Punts again! #copolitics #coleg https://t.co/RvN8IH1b7D
— Michael Fields (@MichaelCLFields) September 6, 2017
And will an extra $550m a year thanks to the SB-267 tax increase, I guess there’s just no money for roads in the current budget. #copolitics https://t.co/86DhXPKF6R
— Jon Caldara (@JonCaldara) September 6, 2017
But we’ll be very interested in seeing what happens with this initiative, since it could take a major argument from local conservatives–that Medicaid and other “social spending” must be cut to pay for infrastructure upgrades everyone agrees are needed–off the table. The zero-sum paradigm forced on the state by the 1992 Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) is an end unto itself for the ideological “starve the beast” right, and they have no interest in upholding the part of the law that allows voters to grow the proverbial pie if they choose.
But when even conservative Republicans like Kevin Grantham agree that something has to be done–and not on the backs of the sick and poor–there is legitimate reason to keep trying.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Lauren Boebert Picks Up George Santos’ Favorite Side Hustle
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Lauren Boebert Picks Up George Santos’ Favorite Side Hustle
BY: allyncooper
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Roads are "free stuff". We can't have that because they are Socialist roads.
These guys belong to the Libertarian religion. To them, the only good road is a private-sector toll road, with private-sector cops, going to private sector National Theme Parks.
So the only road they travel is E-470?
Hope Moldy blows out a tire on a pothole that he didn't want fixed.
The so-called establishment Repubs need to grow a pair and stand up to the lunatic fringe.
I personally agree with those who say we could find the money to fix the roads without raising taxes if we were serious about prioritizing. Most of the patients in the Medicaid expansion are able bodied adults. We don't need to cover them and we could spend that money better on the roads.
But at least they want to go to the voters like TABOR requires. Good luck and let the chips fall where they may.
What do you know about their circumstances? Who are you to judge? You just use Medicaid cuts for roads as an excuse to screw people over.
Moldy — I presume you too are "able-bodied" (which says nothing about your mental capacity). How many times do you or your family go to the doctor? How many prescriptions do you need?
Do you have health insurance? If so, why? You're able-bodied, right?
All great questions Moldy shouldn't be afraid to answer since he is so comfortable playing judge, jury and executioner over everyone else's healthcare needs.
With all due respect, f*ck you Moddy, with your "We don't need to cover them and the money could be better spent on roads." In 2012, the Medicaid expansion saved my life, while I was working, but underpaid.
Who are you to say my life was worth less than fixing a pothole? Especially when there’s enough money to do both if corporations paid the taxes they should be paying?
You don't need to know any more than that, but there are plenty of stories like mine….even plenty among hard core Republican party loyalists.
And you contribute more to society than Moldy does
My parakeet contributes more to society than Moldy does. And my parakeet is dead!
Moldy does contribute a great stench. Stay upwind my friend.
Moderatus doesn't understand how the state budget works. And it was his far right wing cronies in the legislature that denied the people the right to vote last November on a roads initiative.
He understands only what his right wing cronies tell him to say.
I will vote against any attempt to subsidize cars and highways with general sales tax revenue.. Let them raise the gas tax, a user fee, and let those who use the roads most pay the most.