President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

This Is What Failed Leadership Looks Like



Empty U.S. House chambers.

Politico:

With the country teetering on this fiscal cliff of deep spending cuts and sharp tax hikes, the philosophical differences, the shortened timetable and the political dynamics appear to be insurmountable hurdles for a bipartisan deal by New Year’s Day.

Hopes of a grand-bargain – to shave trillions of dollars off the deficit by cutting entitlement programs and raising revenue – are shattered. House Republicans already failed to pass their “Plan B” proposal. And now aides and senators say the White House’s smaller, fall-back plan floated last week is a non-starter among Republicans in Senate – much less the House.

On top of that, the Treasury Department announced Wednesday that the nation would hit the debt limit on Dec. 31, and would then have to take “extraordinary measures” to avoid exhausting the government’s borrowing limit in the New Year.

Adds the Washington Post:

If anything, hope for success appeared to have dimmed over the Christmas holiday. The Republican-controlled House last week abdicated responsibility for resolving the crisis, leaving all eyes on the Senate. But senior aides in both parties said Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have not met or even spoken since leaving town for the weekend…

With no sign of urgency, aides in both parties predicted that failure was not just a possibility – it was rapidly becoming the most likely outcome. No significant movement was expected Thursday: Obama was scheduled to be in the air traveling back from his Hawaiian holiday for a good portion of the day, and the Senate wasn’t set to convene for votes until the evening.

Even if some miraculous breakthrough in the Senate could be achieved, another round of winter weather in the Washington, D.C. area this weekend could well disrupt air travel, making it difficult for House members to reconvene in time for a vote before the new year–and that assumes the Republican-controlled House of Representatives is a body capable of passing anything the President would be able to sign. After the failure before Christmas by Speaker John Boehner to pass his “Plan B” alternative measure, a red-on-red disaster abetted by at least two Colorado Republican members of Congress, dysfunction seems to be the rule.

The public is becoming increasingly, undeniably aware of who is to blame for the impasse, as a poll released yesterday shows once again–Huffington Post reports:

President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats got a moderate boost in approval ratings for their handling of the crisis. Obama’s rating on the negotiations rose to a majority 54 percent, while approval for Democratic leaders in Congress jumped to 45 percent. Republicans did not see similar gains, with their number holding nearly steady at 26 percent. [Pols emphasis]

Any shift in approval didn’t appear to affect the desire for bipartisan deal-making. Just 22 percent of people said either side should stick to its principles, while 68 percent called for a compromise.

And this is the key: President Barack Obama has already compromised. A casual look at the offers the President has made, both increasing the threshold of income at which higher tax rates would apply, as well as offering entitlement rate-of-growth cuts that have genuinely upset liberal Democrats, and there’s no question which side has offered more to get a deal. We don’t really think the administration can offer much more without putting itself in a situation similar to that faced by Boehner–a fact made even clearer by the intense public opposition to cutting institutions like Social Security and Medicare. One small upshot is that as the scale of what can be achieved with an intransigent GOP-controlled House diminishes, so do the cuts.

Politically, it’s critical to understand that this is not 2009. There is no upwelling of conservative opposition brewing as was the case with the then-incipient “Tea Party.” The country has been through years of exactly this kind of obstruction and brinkmanship since Republicans retook control of the House in 2010. The voters want solutions. They are tired of rhetoric. What the polls show is a growing fatigue with Republican intransigence, and a growing understanding that it is Republican intransigence at the heart of much of their frustration with government.

It is not “bias” to acknowledge when one side is plainly losing.

What Would You Do With The Powerball Jackpot?

A poll follows–and remember, you can’t win if you don’t play.

Dick Morris Admits What You Already Know

Newshounds:

Dick Morris visited the Hannity show [Monday night] to explain how he got it so wrong with his prediction of a “landslidey” Romney win. After blaming Hurricane Sandy and acknowledging that he got it “dead wrong” about the demographic turnout, Morris made a jaw-dropping admission. That his prediction was designed to help turn around Romney’s failing campaign…

Morris openly admitted his prediction was an election ploy:

“Sean, I hope people aren’t mad at me about it… I spoke about what I believed and I think that there was a period of time when the Romney campaign was falling apart, people were not optimistic, nobody thought there was a chance of victory and I felt that it was my duty at that point to go out and say what I said.” [Pols emphasis] And at the time that I said it, I believe I was right.

Dick Morris, a former advisor to Bill Clinton turned into a relentlessly pro-GOP cheerleader and laughably inaccurate predictor of future political events, was brought to Colorado by the conservative group Americans for Prosperity in September. At the time, Morris was of course confidently predicting a landslide victory on Election Day for Mitt Romney.

They say “fake it ’til you make it,” but as we’ve established, in 2012 they were just…faking it.

What?! I-25 Will Be Closed Tonight?!

Hopefully you’re not just realizing this now. Aren’t you glad you watch the news? 9NEWS has some helpful tips for navigating the city while Interstate 25 is closed this evening from 5:00PM to 10:00PM for the presidential debate at the University of Denver: Alternate routes like C-470, Interstate-225, Santa Fe Drive and Hampden Avenue are […]

Commissioners: “We don’t care what you say, really.”

After shooting down calls to augment their membership because it would “expand government,” the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners last week voted to create two metropolitan districts, despite preexisting policy and the best advice of their staff.

From the Golden Transcript:

Jefferson County commissioners overruled a prerecession policy last week in support of the developers of the former Green Gables country club.

The unanimous decision during last week’s regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners granted the developers permission to form two Green Games Metropolitan Districts. Once formed, the districts will take out mill-levy bonds, raising the millions of dollars needed to construct the necessary infrastructure for planned developments, including roads, sidewalks, water lines, storm water drainage, common areas and parkland.

“The total cost for improvements for both districts is a little more than $37 million,” county planner Alan Tiefenbach told the commissioners.

Tiefenbach said that county staff had recommended denial of Metro District One, which would include most of the residential space, because of a policy a former Board of County Commissioners had set.

Policy Part 7, Chapter 2, Section 5.A.6 states that “the use of special districts solely as a financing mechanism,” for making necessary development improvements is to be discouraged by the county.

The county’s current supervisor of planning, Mike Schuster, said by phone that his understanding was that the policy was written before 2008 in response to complaints from some residents that their property-tax burden was made significantly greater than their neighbors by developers using special-district taxes, instead of their own pockets to pay for upfront infrastructure costs.

At the hearing, Tiefenbach said developers historically pass along those costs through increased lot-sale prices. However, when property taxes are used to cover infrastructure costs, he said, there is no compelling reason the developers could not still sell the lots for a slightly higher price.

“In this case it could be considered double dipping,” Tiefenbach said.

During last week’s meeting, though, both the applicant, and board of commissioners Chairman Donald Rosier said the practice of using metropolitan districts to help fund up-front development costs has become increasingly common and necessary in recent years.

“I have formed many metro districts, and I know that without those districts, those communities would not exist nowadays,” Rosier said.

This is yet another example of the Board kowtowing to the whims of developers without first considering the needs of the communities involved. As the county supervisor of planning — inarguably the person who best understands the implications of development — mentions, county residents are adversely affected when special districts are created exclusively for financing purposes.

If you follow the Board’s logic, then, it’s a bad “expansion of government” when there are more elected officials around to respond to constituent needs and a good “expansion of government” when taxpayers foot the bill for private development. In other words, government expansion is something to be afraid of when it means more accountability, and something to cherish when it means higher property taxes. It almost makes sense! What’s the best way to combat the big, bad-government? More powerful private entities, of course!

Beyond the larger implications of this decision, it’s absurd that the commissioners are so willing to ignore the advice of their staff. The Board was given the professional opinion of two county planners, educated experts in local government zoning and taxation, on the topic of zoning and taxation. That opinion, however, ran counter to what the commissioners intended to do all along and was summarily swept under the rug.

What’s the point of asking for professional advice if you’re just going to ignore it? Furthermore, why even have a staff of experts educated in various disciplines of local government if their input doesn’t influence your decision?

Hell, maybe the commissioners’ end game is to shrink county government after all. Shrink it, that is, down to just three members.

In the echo chamber that is the Board of County Commissioners, only three voices really matter in the end.  

What’s Summers’ Strategy in SD-22?

In mid-August, State Representative Andy Kerr for the first time surpassed Republican opponent Ken Summers in funds raised, spent, and on hand in the SD-22 race. In the intervening period, Kerr has kept the pressure on, raising just under $48,000 since July 27th. To put that figure in perspective, that means Kerr has hauled in upwards of $900 a day over the past month and a half.

Summers, meanwhile, raised just over $24,000 in the same period, a rate of about $470 day. That’s right. Kerr has outraised his opponent by a 2-1 margin.

Kerr has lost the lead in cash-on-hand, but that’s not surprising with election day fewer than 50 days away. Since late July, the Democrat has spent just over $44,000, compared to $4,900 for Summers. It’s not as if Kerr is wasting any money, however: the lion’s share of his expenses relate to direct mail costs. Kerr is spending money to connect with voters. More importantly, he’s bringing in more than enough to offset his high burn rate.

Summers, on the other hand, has spent a relatively paltry few thousand on brochures, lapel pins, stamps, and the consulting services of a “field director.”

The SD-22 race is incredibly competitive on paper. Two equally-qualified, incumbent state representatives are running against each other in a district with functionally equal registration numbers. Because neither candidate enjoys a natural advantage, this is one of those campaigns where strategy will or lose the race.

Which begs the question: is Ken Summers incompetent? It bears repeating: election day is now less than two months away. Summers needed to use the summer to engage in substantive voter contact by spending money on direct mail and walk pieces. Ballots will start arriving in mailboxes in a month, at most. Summers hasn’t even started to connect with most of the district, and a month is far too little time to whittle away at Kerr’s lead. Summers has been out walking, but there’s no way he’ll have canvassed as many homes as Kerr’s mail pieces, not to mention the Democrat’s strong and sustained volunteer field efforts. It wouldn’t make a difference if Summers were to spend all $82,000 in his campaign coffers on outreach at this point. Because he hasn’t even made a first impression on many of the district’s voters, saturating SD-22 now won’t boost his profile meaningfully.

Summers may be planning for a late-campaign television blitz. He’s got plenty for a cable advertisement — he’ll only after to buy in one zone — but, effective as TV may be, there are so many ads inundating sets right now that Summers’ spots for a local seat may be drowned out by the noise from the presidential race. Television in a local campaign is most powerful when paired with a robust field and mail effort; voters hear your name on the air and then remember you when they’re contacted again. Summers hasn’t raised enough to afford both television and direct mail on his own, however.

A few conclusions can be drawn from Summers’ strategy at this juncture. The Republican may have good reason to believe that independent expenditure groups will swoop in and dramatically supplement his campaign efforts at the last minute. He also might have purchased direct mail services and is waiting to pay his bill and report those expenditures until he has a better feel for how much will have to come out of his coffers.

Or, perhaps, Summers just doesn’t have the desire, know-how, or tenacity to run the campaign he needs to in order to win this seat. Although Summers has never had a real opponent before, it’s unlikely Republicans would allow him to run such an abysmal race.

But it’s certainly not impossible.

Have you received a mail or walk piece from the Kerr or Summers campaign? E-mail us: info(at)jeffcopols.com.

This Is What a “Convention Bounce” Looks Like

The Los Angeles Times confirms analysis from our readers Friday: President Obama’s post-convention “bounce” continued to grow Saturday, as new polls showed him widening a lead over Republican nominee Mitt Romney. Obama’s lead over Romney among registered voters grew to 49%-45% in Gallup’s tracking poll. The 49% for Obama was his highest point in the […]

When They Can’t Admit What Everybody Knows

Of the many snippets we were forwarded this week about Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s latest attempt to challenge the citizenship of voters he “believes” may not be legally registered–a campaign headed for failure as the results appear to make a joke of Gessler’s dire predictions–this audio of an exchange between Deputy Secretary of […]

What The Hell Is Scott Gessler Thinking?

UPDATE: For what it’s worth, the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel Tweets from the RNC: —– After days of press about Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s unswerving focus on tracking down and purging from the rolls what appears to be a tiny number–if any at all–of improperly registered noncitizen voters, Colorado Public Radio’s Megan Verlee […]

Recent Polling Shows…Eh, Whatever

Democrat Brandon Shaffer is doing his dardnest to make a race out of his challenge to incumbent Republican Rep. Cory Gardner in CD-4. But as we’ve said in this space before, the makeup of the district leaves little room for a potential Shaffer upset. That doesn’t mean that Shaffer’s team can’t try to show some […]

Login

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

68 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!