One a more serious note, the Grand Junction Sentinel’s Charles Ashby reports:
GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis has until Sept. 3 to respond to a request for an investigation in an attorney-discipline case filed against him that could affect his license to practice law.
Denver attorney Luis Toro, executive director of the progressive group Colorado Ethics Watch, filed the request with the state’s Attorney Regulation Counsel against McInnis soon after the former congressman admitted last month to plagiarizing material in articles about water for which a Pueblo foundation paid him $300,000…
Toro said he filed the investigation request because McInnis may be in violation of two provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, which practicing attorneys in the state are required to follow. Those rules center on an attorney’s duty not to engage in dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and whether McInnis failed to properly supervise a nonlawyer in his employ.
“We’re just asking for an investigation because we don’t know … but if we didn’t do it, maybe nobody would,” Toro said. “This is not a simple, straightforward plagiarism case. It’s a lot more complicated than that.”
Colorado Ethics Watch is frequently dismissed as a partisan hit group, but in this case, it’s tough to imagine a more winnable case to take on–McInnis could be very good for their success ratio.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
For the most part, the Rules of Professional Conduct Apply only when lawyers are acting as lawyers. For example, the “truthfulness” rule, 4.1, begins: In the course of representing a client . . .” I don’t see that McInnis was acting as a lawyer in any of this.
There are some general obligations that aren’t limited in this way, but I would be shocked if McInnis is disbarred, or suspended, or anything else very serious. Frankly, I think this reflects badly on Toro, given that it smells of using the professional rules for partisan purposes.
Toro said he wants an investigation because he’s not sure what’s “right” in this matter.
I think it’s fine to ask questions, as long as you are prepared to live with the answers.
Then there certainly ought to be. Several news reports have talked about this being actionable, so maybe Luis is just being cautious after getting burned a few times.
Then again, weed attorney Robert Corry assaulted a female college student and is still practicing, so maybe the standards are far too low.
The Code of Conduct is one that all members of the legal profession are to uphold, including staff such as paralegals.
most of the lawyers serving in Congress should be disbarred?
McInnis has to respond, and that response should be interesting. Do the Hasans get to respond too?
Toro’s group is a political hit squad, and has questionable ethics of its own.
Nonetheless, these are serious allegations about McInnis – some of which he has admitted doing. Not only was there plagiarism and the theft of intellectual property, there is also an issue whether he took money from the Hasan Foundation is what may be akin to a fraudulent act.
I think that there should be an inquiry by a nonpartisan, objective and competent person or entity – and we should not overlook the law firm where he is a partner. They may well have an exposure if they knew what he was doing and condoned it.
While I have no regard for Toro’s group and find them despicable, the McInnis situation legitimately calls for an inquiry.
But it’s almost unheard of for lawyers to be disciplined for anything other than raiding their firm’s trust fund (the clients’ money) for personal use.
I’ve seen nothing to indicate any such involvement in this case.
Scooter just took the money, did very little for it and what he did produce came originally from Greg Hobbs, without credit.
It’s a juicy political scandal, but as another polster noted above, lawyers have done far worse and avoided discipline.
for stealing from a judge, right?
There are some cases of attorneys being disciplined for conduct that was not criminal and did not involve a client or drug/alcohol abuse. I know of a couple:
http://www.coloradosupremecour…
http://www.coloradosupremecour…
But you’re right, the #1 offense is taking money out of the trust fund, followed by having sex with clients and drug/alcohol offenses. I’d be surprised if Scooter gets any public discipline.