U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 26, 2010 09:44 PM UTC

Tipton's "Buckpedaling"--Not Going Well

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

In the Grand Junction Sentinel’s story today about the various major candidates in Colorado races reversing themselves on policy positions, there’s something for everybody. Charles Ashby mentions Senate candidate Ken Buck’s foibles on abortion, Dan Maes’ shifts on immigration (as if anyone really cares at this point), and yes, even Michael Bennet’s sponsorship of pay-as-you-go budgeting, which he later voted to suspend for a jobs bill. Fair is fair.

But when Ashby turns to CD-3 candidate Scott Tipton? Things take a turn for the silly.

Like Buck, Tipton also has been called out for saying he supported doing away with the 17th Amendment and the Education Department. The Cortez state legislator says that’s the problem with simple yes-or-no surveys, that there is no room for nuanced answers…

Not all of the surveys, however, called for yes or no answers. For the Craig tea party group, Bears Ears Patriots, its survey included seven options, from strongly oppose to strongly favor.

In its survey, Tipton said he strongly favored the dismantling of the federal department and returning its authority to state and local governments.

“What I’ve been saying consistently since we started is that I believe in local control for education,” Tipton said. “That being said, 70 percent of the Western Slope, 50 percent of the 3rd Congressional District on average is either on federal, state or tribal land, so we need those (federal) dollars. My issue with the Department of Education is, it’s always with strings attached.”

Tipton said his plan for that department is the same as his plan for the entire federal government, to cut it in half. [Pols emphasis] He said he plans to do that without cutting government services, something his Democratic rival, U.S. Rep. John Salazar, says is impossible…

Okay, so Tipton does want to cut the federal government “in half” again? Because we were under the impression he had ditched that plank in his platform in favor of something a bit less absurd. Maybe keeping “I meant cut it in half” in his back pocket for when people ask him what he was smoking before, when he called for abolishing an entire federal department, is a good idea–but wait! “Cut the government in half” isn’t any better! That’s why he ditched it to begin with!

And he did abandon it, folks–KRDO-TV reported three days ago that Tipton “has publicly backed off his ‘federal government that is half the size and cost’ statement.” He should have left it there to die quietly–to volunteer a proposal you’ve already flip-flopped on, so as to deflect criticism that you are, you know, flip-flopping…this is so ridiculous it’s actually rather tough to keep straight.

It’s not the first time this election season where we’ve had to pause and think to ourselves, “this can’t possibly represent a serious threat, can it?” Then we read polls that say Tipton actually has a chance of winning. All we can say about that is, if it’s true, he had better make the most of it–because this totally unhinged year is the only year he could ever have that chance.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Tipton’s “Buckpedaling”–Not Going Well

  1. He will make Doug Lamborn look like a Rhodes Scholar. Another one where I trust in providence: the people of CD-3 are not this stupid. I believe that until they prove me wrong.

    1. Everyone’s taken a whiff of the stupid gas this year.

      That’s the only explanation I have for the reason the public would absorb the cognitive dissonance these right wing candidates are pumping out this year.

      1. A totally unconstitutional abridgement of the First Amendment (so sez the court), but his heart was in the right place.

        He also voted for and was a quite strong proponent of the healthcare bill in the end, after it got watered down and corporatized to Ben Nelson’s specifications.

        For a pretty red district, he’s worth voting for. Tipton’s a nutbag.

      2. 1. He gives a shit about veterans. He served himself. Tipton is a chickenhawk.

        2. He voted for health care reform. Tipton calls for “repeal and replace” but can’t come up with anything on the “replace” side.

        3. Salazar is on the House Appropriations Committee. This matters for districts out in the boondocks, like ours is.

        4. He’s NOT Scott Tipton.

    1. Spend your time making GOTV contacts with Dems. to tell them to vote.  This piece of arrogance offers nothing in terms of coherent ideas or anything interesting to read (I’m on the winning side because I’m a winner, blah blah blah) so skip the replies and spend your time doing something constructive.

  2. Tipton said his plan for that department is the same as his plan for the entire federal government, to cut it in half.

    This is the same logic used by advocates of 60, 61, and 101. It doesn’t check out.  

  3. Salazar should have been raising these issues long ago.  He has ceded the lead and the momentum to Tipton.  Salazar is going to have a tough time pulling this one out.

    Ed Perlmutter on the other hand went right on the attack against Frazier and should win a tough race.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

64 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!