In the Grand Junction Sentinel’s story today about the various major candidates in Colorado races reversing themselves on policy positions, there’s something for everybody. Charles Ashby mentions Senate candidate Ken Buck’s foibles on abortion, Dan Maes’ shifts on immigration (as if anyone really cares at this point), and yes, even Michael Bennet’s sponsorship of pay-as-you-go budgeting, which he later voted to suspend for a jobs bill. Fair is fair.
But when Ashby turns to CD-3 candidate Scott Tipton? Things take a turn for the silly.
Like Buck, Tipton also has been called out for saying he supported doing away with the 17th Amendment and the Education Department. The Cortez state legislator says that’s the problem with simple yes-or-no surveys, that there is no room for nuanced answers…
Not all of the surveys, however, called for yes or no answers. For the Craig tea party group, Bears Ears Patriots, its survey included seven options, from strongly oppose to strongly favor.
In its survey, Tipton said he strongly favored the dismantling of the federal department and returning its authority to state and local governments.
“What I’ve been saying consistently since we started is that I believe in local control for education,” Tipton said. “That being said, 70 percent of the Western Slope, 50 percent of the 3rd Congressional District on average is either on federal, state or tribal land, so we need those (federal) dollars. My issue with the Department of Education is, it’s always with strings attached.”
Tipton said his plan for that department is the same as his plan for the entire federal government, to cut it in half. [Pols emphasis] He said he plans to do that without cutting government services, something his Democratic rival, U.S. Rep. John Salazar, says is impossible…
Okay, so Tipton does want to cut the federal government “in half” again? Because we were under the impression he had ditched that plank in his platform in favor of something a bit less absurd. Maybe keeping “I meant cut it in half” in his back pocket for when people ask him what he was smoking before, when he called for abolishing an entire federal department, is a good idea–but wait! “Cut the government in half” isn’t any better! That’s why he ditched it to begin with!
And he did abandon it, folks–KRDO-TV reported three days ago that Tipton “has publicly backed off his ‘federal government that is half the size and cost’ statement.” He should have left it there to die quietly–to volunteer a proposal you’ve already flip-flopped on, so as to deflect criticism that you are, you know, flip-flopping…this is so ridiculous it’s actually rather tough to keep straight.
It’s not the first time this election season where we’ve had to pause and think to ourselves, “this can’t possibly represent a serious threat, can it?” Then we read polls that say Tipton actually has a chance of winning. All we can say about that is, if it’s true, he had better make the most of it–because this totally unhinged year is the only year he could ever have that chance.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Latest Ballot Return Numbers: Strong Returns for Democrats
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Dems Close Ranks As Trump Tries To Exploit SoS Password Pickle
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Mayor Mike’s Aurora Empire Crumbling From The Inside?
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Evans’ Explanation for Skipping Gay Marriage Vote Puzzles His Colleagues
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Dems Close Ranks As Trump Tries To Exploit SoS Password Pickle
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Latest Ballot Return Numbers: Strong Returns for Democrats
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Latest Ballot Return Numbers: Strong Returns for Democrats
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Evans’ Explanation for Skipping Gay Marriage Vote Puzzles His Colleagues
BY: Air Slash
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
He will make Doug Lamborn look like a Rhodes Scholar. Another one where I trust in providence: the people of CD-3 are not this stupid. I believe that until they prove me wrong.
Everyone’s taken a whiff of the stupid gas this year.
That’s the only explanation I have for the reason the public would absorb the cognitive dissonance these right wing candidates are pumping out this year.
but what are Salazar’s issues? As much as I want to find a reason to vote FOR Salazar, I’m still waiting for him to do something significant.
A totally unconstitutional abridgement of the First Amendment (so sez the court), but his heart was in the right place.
He also voted for and was a quite strong proponent of the healthcare bill in the end, after it got watered down and corporatized to Ben Nelson’s specifications.
For a pretty red district, he’s worth voting for. Tipton’s a nutbag.
1. He gives a shit about veterans. He served himself. Tipton is a chickenhawk.
2. He voted for health care reform. Tipton calls for “repeal and replace” but can’t come up with anything on the “replace” side.
3. Salazar is on the House Appropriations Committee. This matters for districts out in the boondocks, like ours is.
4. He’s NOT Scott Tipton.
Unstoppable force and all that. 538 just moved this race from 56% to 59%. Hold your breath and stomp on the floor. It’s not changing your fate.
http://nyti.ms/aWTNO8
You can go away now and skip the next five weeks of buckpedaling. Mission accomplished!
Spend your time making GOTV contacts with Dems. to tell them to vote. This piece of arrogance offers nothing in terms of coherent ideas or anything interesting to read (I’m on the winning side because I’m a winner, blah blah blah) so skip the replies and spend your time doing something constructive.
This is the same logic used by advocates of 60, 61, and 101. It doesn’t check out.
Salazar should have been raising these issues long ago. He has ceded the lead and the momentum to Tipton. Salazar is going to have a tough time pulling this one out.
Ed Perlmutter on the other hand went right on the attack against Frazier and should win a tough race.
Late, but he’s hired the A team. He’ll pull through, barely.