President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
November 16, 2011 07:25 AM UTC
15 Comments
And yet, onward he plods and at the taxpayer’s expense, it appears. What a waste of time and dime.
I can’t wait until he actually gets around to doing the job he was hired to do.
It’s just not the taxpayers that hired him.
Gessler is fighting God’s battles, trying to ensure that illegal immigrants and thieving Democrats don’t steal our elections.
This is about campaign finance reports. You have your canned talking points in a knot, dear boy!
he is just going to keep appealing until he wins, I take it. i am sure that we the 99% of the taxpayers will be delighted to fund his jihad
“[The judge] wanted to say nasty things about me in the newspaper.” The judge didn’t say anything in the paper. He said them in open court, in questioning an argument made by Gessler’s attorney. That is how the system works. It is unseemly for the Secretary of State, speaking at a partisan function, to be accusing a judge of grandstanding. It is particularly inappropriate when the accusation is unfounded.
But is it contemptible?
And who does take over if the SOS is in jail?
AGOP could blame that on “joker veterans”
on the record with the press after a case has been tried and is in the judge’s hands awaiting a ruling if I were him.
But, yes, it is pending (I think the trial is scheduled for April) and it is not wise to be commenting. But then, Gessler seems more “smart” than “wise.”
I had the inactive voter case on my mind instead of this one.
needs to be resolved by the Legislature, not Gessler.
The Legislature makes the laws, Gessler is supposed to implement them.
There will be legislation passed before this ever gets to an appeals court.
Kidding! 🙂