CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

June 17, 2013 01:59 PM UTC

Supreme Court Strikes Down Proof of Citizenship Requirement for Voting

1 Comments
by: Colorado Pols

From NBC News:

The Supreme Court on Monday struck down an Arizona law that requires people to submit proof of citizenship when they register to vote.

The vote was 7-2. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, said that a 1993 federal law known as the Motor Voter Act takes precedence over the Arizona law because of its requirement that states “accept and use” the federal voter registration form…

…Citizenship is a requirement to vote in any federal election, and the federal registration form requires people to state, under penalty of perjury, that they are American citizens. States can use their own forms, but they must be equivalent to the federal form.

The Arizona law, known as Proposition 200 and adopted by Arizona voters in 2004, went further than the federal form by requiring applicants to provide proof of citizenship. Arizona has used the law to reject 30,000 voter applications, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

Challengers to the law argued that it put an extra burden on naturalized citizens. Using a naturalization document as proof would require an applicant to register in person, as opposed to through the mail, because federal law prohibits copying the document.

Proving that you are a Colorado resident and proving U.S. citizenship are, obviously, entirely different matters. Secretary of State Scott Gessler will no doubt be on the rampage with this decision as he continues his quest to convince people that illegal immigrants are voting in Colorado (including county clerks, who don't know what Gessler is talking about). Of course, there is no proof that illegal immigrants voting in Colorado is an actual problem, but Gessler and friends have some new complaints to use in touting their manufactured crisis.

We'd say the Supreme Court's decision is a setback for Gessler's cause, but it's not as though this was ever a fact-based campaign to begin with.

One thought on “Supreme Court Strikes Down Proof of Citizenship Requirement for Voting”

Urban Snowshoer says:

June 17, 2013 at 8:28 pm

This decision will push buttons in those who were convinced that vans full of illegal immigrants showed up to the polls to support President Obama. Other than these wingnuts, this decision will quietly fade out of the spotlight soon enough.

Log in to Reply

Login

Lost Password

Supreme Court Strikes Down Proof of Citizenship Requirement for Voting

Comments

One thought on “Supreme Court Strikes Down Proof of Citizenship Requirement for Voting”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Recent Comments

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Newsletter