Fix It, Don’t Repeal (Or Break) It

Sen. Mark Udall.

Sen. Mark Udall.

The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports on discussions in the U.S. Senate, which appear to now involve both Colorado U.S. Senators, on possible "fixes" to solves problems associated with the troubled rollout of the new Affordable Care Act insurance marketplaces:

Senate Democrats facing tough reelections say President Obama has not done enough to fix the botched rollout of his healthcare law and are vowing to repair it themselves.

The Senate Democratic leadership is not on board with lawmaker plans to begin rewriting ObamaCare and have urged for more time to assess the changes made by Obama and his team, lawmakers say…

“The [ObamaCare implementation] upgrade has been significant, but there’s more work to be done,” said [Sen Mark] Udall.

“Sen. Landrieu, Sen. Heitkamp, Sen. Shaheen and I are all working on a package that would incorporate our ideas,” he added.

Shaheen wants to extend the enrollment period for the ACA; Landrieu wants to mandate that insurance companies continue to offer plans that people like, even if they don’t meet the law’s requirements; and Udall wants to expand the pool of people included in the individual insurance marketplace.

Last month, Sen. Mark Udall's proposal to temporarily allow Americans to renew health insurance plans not in compliance with the Affordable Care Act's reforms raised some eyebrows, and this ongoing discussion about changes to the law isn't likely to sit well with many health care reform proponents. Just after Udall's first proposal came out, research from Udall's own office found that the vast majority of "cancellations" in Colorado actually weren't–most of the affected consumers on the individual market had indeed been given the option to renew their existing coverage into 2014. Nonetheless, the slow pace of marketplace insurance signups in Colorado and elsewhere, still more attributable to technical problems than any other factor, is growing increasingly urgent as deadlines approach.

To a certain extent, there's a need now for Democratic proponents of health care reform to accept that the protracted startup problems for the exchanges are causing real problems for citizens, that may indeed require fixes beyond what the Obama administration can do without Congress. That doesn't mean any of these current ideas from swing-state Senators will become law, between defensive Democrats and belligerent Republicans determined to not help fix a law they believe to be inherently evil. We also like the sound of what Udall is proposing based on this report better than Sen. Mary Landrieu's idea to simply allow noncompliant health insurance to be sold in perpetuity. But between the legitimate problems that exist today and the GOP's dogmatic resolve to kill the entire health reform law by any means necessary, a middle ground desiring to fix, but not repeal Obamacare, may well emerge as the political sweet spot in this debate.

The one other point we'll note from this Hill story is the role of Colorado's junior Sen. Michael Bennet in these discussions. Though considered a centrist, Bennet's close relationship with the White House, and status as head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, signal to us that these discussions have at least a liaison talking to the Obama administration. Politically, the thing to keep in mind is that Sen. Udall is on the ballot in 2014, not Obama–and though we absolutely believe they share a common goal of successful health care reform, a little judicious triangulation off Obama and the recent troubles with Obamacare may not be such a bad idea.

5 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

    Tough truth. I get what you're saying, but this could easily become a problem if it gets away from Udall and these other "concerned" Democrats. I would personally rather see Dems stay on the same page. Damn this fucked up rollout.

    • MADCO says:

      ACA is not a website.

      if walmart's website sucks (it did for a long time) no big deal.

      If amazon's web sucks it s a HUGE deal.

      The ACA site opened badly in some states. ACA is not the website.

  2. ModeratusModeratus says:

    Pols, it seems your readers are not enthusiastic. Maybe you tried to shine this turd for too long?

    • Duke CoxDuke Cox says:

      Wishful thinking on your part, loser. The ACA will continue to grow in popularity and the only thing elected Dems are indicating by said triangulation is they are cowards who are more afraid of losing their next election than helping the American people.

      I listened to a few interviews on NPR of some southern folks, speaking about their opinion of "Obamacare". They scorned it. Then, when asked exactly what they didn't like about it, they couldn't answer because they didn't actually know anything substantial about it.

      Their scorn was based on the never-ending rhetoric served up by the rabid right. If Dems want to win, they need to pitch in and participate in the defense of the president and the ACA.

      Until the time when smart folks like Colin Powell figure out how to give the American people a single-payer system (or at the very least, a public option within the ACA), the ACA is demonstrably better than the "free market" health care system we had. Leaving the health care of the American people to the bottom line of United Healthcare, et al, is the worst possible solution.

      • bullshit!bullshit! says:

        That's being a little hard on Udall. I agree with Pols that it's time to accept the botched exchange roll out has hurt Democrats and inconvenienced ordinary Americans. There is hardly a law in existence that hasn't been amended in some way. Before we freak out about fixes, let's see what makes sense.

        Udall doesn't want to kill Obamacare. I trust him that much.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.