CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 13, 2014 09:38 AM UTC

Poll: Land Use, Clean Air and Water Could Impact 2014 Elections

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Colorado College has released results from its 4th Annual "Conservation in the West" poll, which shows that voters are increasingly considering conservation and environmental issues when making their decisions at the ballot box. From a press release:

This year’s bipartisan survey of 2,400 registered voters across six states looked at voter attitudes on a list of issues, including land use, water supplies, air quality and public lands’ impact on the economy. The results show overwhelming – 85 percent – agreement that when the government closes national parks and other public lands, small businesses and communities' economies in the West suffer. In a follow up message to elected officials and land managers, 83 percent believe funding to national parks, forests and other public lands should not be cut, as it provides a big return on a small investment.
 
"The Rocky Mountain region is politically diverse, with communities running the spectrum from red (predominantly) to purple to blue,” said Colorado College McHugh Professor of Leadership and American Institutions and regular Colorado political commentator Tom Cronin. “These poll results reinforce that a love for protected lands ties western voters together. Westerners across the political spectrum support the work of public land managers and expect conserved public lands to remain that way."
 
Other public sentiments expressed in the survey include that:

  • 72 percent of Westerners are more likely to vote for a candidate who wants to promote more use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power.
  • 69 percent of Westerners are more likely to vote for a candidate who supports enhancing protections for some public lands, like national forests.
  • 58 percent of Westerners are more likely to vote for a candidate who votes to increase funding for land-managing agencies like the U.S. Forest Service. 

The survey also holds warning signs for candidates, including that:

  • 72 percent of Westerners are less likely to vote for a candidate who supports selling public lands like national forests to reduce the budget deficit.
  • 67 percent of Westerners are less likely to vote for a candidate who reduces funding for agencies like the U.S. Forest Service.
  • 54 percent of westerners are less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to stop taxpayer support for solar and wind energy companies.

Of particular interest is how much conservation and environmental issues tend to have a stronger impact on Hispanic voters, who aren't only interested in the issue of immigration reform. If Colorado Republicans are going to start winning over Hispanic voters, renewable energy, clean air, and clean water is a good place to start.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Poll: Land Use, Clean Air and Water Could Impact 2014 Elections

  1. Shall we take a poll and see which of the six in the Republican primary are going to build a platform around this?  If Colorado Republicans are going to start winning over Hispanics, they better let the words "climate change" pass their lips more than once or twice.  It's the "Brophy Conundrum": he thinks all that new-found CO2 makes his watermelons bigger – while simultaneously losing the fastest growing demographic in the state. 

  2. Message from Coloardo citizens  to the Colorado House & Senate, and our Governor – read this sub-poll – http://www.coloradocollege.edu/dotAsset/525b80a5-f29b-4587-a1c8-16d1dd0cff46.pdf

    55% want the state to "allow local communities to regulate the location and extent of fracking, so they can decide what happens in their community."

    Only 22% want the state to "regulate the location and extent of fracking, so that there are consistent standards."

    The remainder do not have an opinion at this time.

    1. Dave, dude, get with the program.  You apparently misplaced your invite to the annual "kill the watermelons" fundraiser in Yuma County.  It's what real men with big guns do…

      1. No wonder people from other cultures think Americans are insane.

        Killing watermelons. It ought to be the name of a punk band.

        In other news, this poll is great, and very promising indeed for some independent, environmentally-minded candidate, should one ever be found in the watermelon patch.

        The climate change "discussion" among the four Republican contenders was worthy of a

      2. Don't be mean. It makes sense for that group to shoot melons. Anything more biologically complicated stands a strong chance of being a superior opponent. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

265 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!