(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
On a recent Spring day Germany generated over 50 percent of its energy from solar:
Germany, with 1.4m PV systems, generated a peak of 23.1GW hours at lunchtime on Monday 9 June, equivalent to 50.6% of its total electricity need. According to government development agency Germany trade and invest (GTAI), solar power grew 34% in the first five months of 2014 compared to last year.
This is truly amazing and shows what can be done with some wise infrastructure investments and a willingness to tell your local Coal Barons to "suck it". Oh wait, that particular Koch – Colorado's own Bill – has seemingly moved on from coal, while Colorado has most decidedly not and still relies on coal for 66% of its energy.
The recent fire and power outage at Colorado Springs' Drake Power Plant has given the city, and the state in my humble opinion, an opportunity to turn its eye towards the future.
But many local business leaders just can't see the obvious benefits of a solar-powered Springs:
The 12 options the City Council is considering for Drake include the costs of building a replacement power source, adding renewable energy, offering demand-side management incentives and adding to Front Range natural gas plant. The best financial option is to keep Drake open for 30 years, according to the consultant's report. Utilities would see a more than $200 million return on its investment.
When Drake is decommissioned, Utilities will need to build a replacement power source, which most likely would be a gas-fired plant. Coal-fired power is produced at roughly half the cost of gas-fired power, but is dirtier.
Utilities is spending about $121 million to install scrubber technology at Drake to meet environmental standards. In June, the Obama administration released a draft of The Clean Power Plan, which calls for reducing carbon dioxide emission at power plants by 30 percent by 2030.
More than 30 coal-fired plants have closed across the county in the wake of strict Environmental Protection Agency regulations, including emission control.
As an astute politician once said, "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon, you're talking real money." That observation and its ramifications here are quite clear. But, besides coal, there is also Colorado's unnatural reliance on hydraulically fractured natural gas and its "clean" fuel — that comes at such a high environmental and human cost.
No news here, but our own Gov. Hickenlooper is a giant fan of fracking. Sadly, news on that front is often troubling as our reliance on coal and our eternal slowness is moving to new energy technologies.
Officials shut drilling waste well after 2nd quake
GREELEY, Colo. (AP) – Colorado regulators have ordered the shutdown of an oil and gas wastewater disposal well east of Greeley after seismologists detected two earthquakes in the area in less than a month.
The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission directed High Sierra Water Services to stop injecting water into the well after a team of University of Colorado seismologists recorded a 2.6-magnitute earthquake Monday afternoon. The team began monitoring the region after a 3.4-magnitude earthquake May 31.
And……..
Man found dead at oil and gas site in Greeley
GREELEY, Colo. (AP) – Authorities are investigating after a 57-year-old Greeley man collapsed and died at an oil and gas site in the tiny northern Colorado town of Gill.
Sheriff's deputies were called to the site near the intersection of Weld County roads 68 and 69 at about 11 a.m. Tuesday. John McNulty was pronounced dead at the scene.
It's long past time for Colorado to use its significant natural resources to power its not insignificant human resources. I'd bet my bottom dollar we could easily top Germany's recent record with enough wind and solar generators located in our fair state. (Maybe with wind alone, have you felt that stuff blow through here?!?!?)
But, it'll never happen with a Governor so fond of fracking, with business leaders so leery of investing, and with voters so dismissive of science and nature.
Our energy problems have been obvious for many years now. The answer to me, my friends, is blowing in the wind….
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: davebarnes
IN: Extra Pod: The Scourge of Uncertified Potatoes (feat. Christy Powell)
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Dave Williams, Vickie Tonkins Accused of Criminal Tampering With Delegate Process
BY: hursa
IN: Half-Assed Attack on Secretary of State’s Office Backfires on Gabe Evans
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Half-Assed Attack on Secretary of State’s Office Backfires on Gabe Evans
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Rep. Brandi Bradley Echoes “Dr. Chaps” Death Threats
BY: Schrodingers Dog
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Schrodingers Dog
IN: Rep. Brandi Bradley Echoes “Dr. Chaps” Death Threats
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Great post and info, Zap. About two years ago I arranged a meeting in CoSprings between some of your utility and council guys with a billion-dollar electronics company, a former CIA Director and Doyle Beneby of Citizens Public Service. This was early on in the Martin-Drake debacle. The electronics firm was looking for a city to host their US headquarters/operations (they are investing heavily in battery and solar technologies), Doyle had already put San Antonio on the glide path to 'green', with his first order of business as CEO to kill a proposed coal plant. The ex-Director was working closely with the military on creating regional opportunities for expanding their 'net zero' accomplishments at Ft. Carson. Long story very short – there just wasn't any interest.
The majority of the council was so hell-bent on proving that angry old white men burn coal (and they weren't about to give the Obama Administration a 'win' in the green debate) they couldn't see the potential (apparently even now) of transitioning CoSprings to one of the first major American cities to go green. It's sad – there is nothing but potential south of Monument Hill – all the way to Pueblo – to create an economic renaissance around a 21st-century energy economy. All you need is elected leaders that can extract themselves from a 19th century mindset (and I understand what a tall order that is for the Pikes Peak Region).
PS: I meant to include that Beneby was present because he was interested in making a 'sister city' connection with CoSprings. They both have very similar military-based economies, and at that time CPS had already successfully brought a handful of clean energy companies in to the city with RFP's issued by their own municipal utility. He thought a cooperative approach would be a win for both cities.
Yup, I agree. It sure as hell isn't coming out of an exhaust pipe…
I think you mean, 'flare gas pipe'? 🙂
I'd just like to point out that, if I recall correctly, Germany was in the middle of a heat wave at the time that the record was set. Yes, that means clear skies, but it also means high demand. Yet, somehow, the grid didn't fall to its knees and collapse in a shower of sparks.
The German grid has one of the highest reliability factors in the world. Colorado's own Amory Lovins at Rocky Mountain Institute recently penned a great overview of the German energy transition, Energiewende.
Germany doesn't have widespread use of air conditioning, because a summer heat wave by German standards is a pleasant late spring day by Colorado standards, and because it is much more expensive to do so. The average high temperature in late June in Berlin is about 73 degrees F, and on June 9, it was in the high 80s.
Germany is in a higher lattitude than mainland U.S. This might indicate less sun for them, but their percentages are astounding.
Wouldn't our position closer to the equator guarantee us an even better return on investment?
Germany's solar resources are sub-par to Michigan, and on par with Alaska. This is what happens when 'leaders lead' instead of pandering….
A history worth remembering and is perhaps being repeated, in 1966-67, The US Army was deposing of waste from decommissioned WWII chemical agents( read what you will here) at the Rocky Mt Arsenal , North of 58th ave in Denver, via deep well injection(to a depth of 80,000ft., if memory serves well. The upshot was a series of (3-4 Richter scale) minor quakes rattling windows and residents. Not in my backyard! Was the hue & cry; the injection well ceased, so did the quakes.
I remember how weird that was to be having earthquakes every couple of weeks. It took 15 years before the Army acknowledged that the deep injection wells had caused the quakes.
I think that there is a correlation between fracking and earthquakes.
There isn't much research out there on the fracking/earthquake connection. The studies that I saw are obviously biased towards fracking, like this one from The Energy Collective. Then there are people who just boldly go there and say, Dallas earthquakes caused by fracking or, here in Colorado, flatly blame the Mesa mudslide on fracking. There are a couple of international studies which also state a connection between earthquakes and deep well injection.
I applaud our President's willingness to study and to act on important environmental issues, like the dying of half the honeybees in the world over the last few years. I'd like to see a real, honest study on how deep well injection is related to earthquakes.
We could also err on the side of caution and let local communities determine if or where they will allow fracking.
And, the evidence is mounting — even in the reddest of drill-baby-drill states:
http://news.msn.com/us/states-confront-worries-about-fracking-quakes
Earthquake and mudslide denial is going to be a little trickier than climate change denial.
Norway is profiting nicely from its 2.3 billion expenditure in the Baaken Shale. ( they aquired fracking technology by buying Bingham Oil drilling) More famous for its explot of share of North seas oil. Their oil company is nationalized, providing cradle to grave amenties we only argue endlessly about, & probably never see in our life times. Dang socailists poaching in our back yard, where art thou, flag draped tea bagged patriots with 7th grade reading skills?
They (the Norwegians) are now moving onto Colorados' western slope with Frams' proposal to drill the slopes of the Grand Mesa. The fragile airshed of Palisade and the agriculture it supports is about to take a hit. As I read the BLMs' EA, they (Fram) have no plans to use green completions or closed loop systems to prevent loss of metahe and VOCs. Palisade farmers should prepare for losses in production if this drilling proposal is successful and goes beyond the exploratory stage.
We are working hard to get air monitoring in place before drilling ramps up.
USDA-ARS has already completed one study on Colorado crops and the negative impacts on corn and wheat from fugitive methane emissions. Perhaps you can get your Rep Scotty to find funding for the emerging western slope issue? Let's just say this: if you live in a red or orange area on this map and you are a farmer, it's not a good thing…