CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 05, 2014 02:38 PM UTC

Some details on how Gardner "built his entire political career on support of personhood"

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Cory Gardner.
Cory Gardner.

Back in July, Cosmo's Ada Calhoun quoted Keith Mason, president of Personhood USA, as saying:

Mason: "[Cory Gardner has] built his entire political career on support of personhood. I think he's just listening to some bad advice, and he's playing politics."

Calhoun didn't get into the details of how and why Gardner relied on personhood to advance himself in politics, so I'll hit on it briefly now, not only because it gives you insight into Gardner but, in the bigger picture, the anti-abortion movement's lock on Republican candidates as they move through caucus and primary processes in Colorado.

From the time he was elected to the State Legislature, Gardner clearly made his anti-abortion stance a priority, sponsoring state personhood legislation, in 2007, defining life as beginning at conception and outlawing abortion even in the case of rape and incest.

In 2008, Gardner stood with other Colorado legislators in support of Colorado's first personhood ballot measure, earning a shout out from Kristi Burton, the mother of our state's personhood movement,

When she helped launch the 2012 personhood measure, which didn't make the ballot, Burton praised Gardner as "very supportive" and "one of our main supporters" of personhood campaigns.

Gardner's deep support from anti-abortion activists paid off as he launched his first congressional campaign against a tough field of candidates, including Tom Lucero, the former CU regent.

At a Tea Party event in November of 2009, Gardner was asked if he'd carry legislation to end the "practice" of abortion:

Gardner: "Yes, and I have a legislative background to back it up."

The applause you hear in the video is a clue to how important the abortion issue is to the activists in attendance. You can imagine the reaction of any if the three candidates present had offered anything but a full-throttle acceptance of banning abortion.

Later, in 2010, Gardner touted his personhood chops at one Republican congressional candidate forum, where he infamously said the following. (Again, note the round of applause.):

Gardner: “I have signed the personhood petition. I have taken the petitions to my church, and circulating into my church. And I have a legislative record that backs up my support for life.”

All his trumpeting of his personhood stance set Gardner up perfectly to win the votes of pro-life delegates at the 2010 GOP district convention, where the congressional nominee is selected.

Indeed, as reported by the Colorado Statesman in May of 2010, Gardner "stormed the 4th Congressional District GOP assembly last Friday — winning 60 percent of the delegate vote and shutting out University of Colorado Regent Tom Lucero and businessman Dean Madere, the two other Republican contenders."

Leslie Jorgensen, covering the assembly for the Statesman, reported a detail that brings us back to the exact point personhood's Keith Mason made about Gardner building his "career on support of personhood."

Jorgensen reported:

Christian Family Alliance of Colorado distributed a flyer to delegates that reported the three candidates’ positions on several conservative issues that included public funded abortions, the personhood ballot initiative, gay rights, and posting the 10 Commandments in public buildings. Gardner scored perfect responses, Lucero missed the mark on two issues, and Madere had “refused to respond.” [BigMedia emphasis.]

This (as well as the rest of this blog post above) obviously isn't proof that Gardner owes his political career solely to his support of personhood, but it's clear enough that personhood was one of the foundational building blocks of his climb to Congress, proving Keith Mason correct and shedding light on the short-term gain GOP candidates encounter by joining with anti-abortion activists. And the long-term pain they encounter if they seek state-wide office in Colorado and are forced to defend their positions.

Comments

9 thoughts on “Some details on how Gardner “built his entire political career on support of personhood”

  1. Keith Mason is 100% correct.

    Cory Gardner is for repealing a woman's right to choose, under any and all circumstances. Period.

    Everything else is meaningless noise, meant to confuse low-infos and obfuscate his real leanings. He supports Personhood every bit as much today as he ever did, and he is lying when he says otherwise. Period.

    He is the sworn, unrelenting enemy of every woman's right to make her own health care decisions.

    1. This is what you do when you've got nothing: Post your favorite sadistic cartoon (bet you get off on it too as an extra added bonus) instead of addressing any of the facts documented in the post. Whenever you do this we know that you know the facts are correct and irrefutable, leaving you with no choice but to go for a "look over there" or in your case another "look at the man in tight pants and shiny boots beating the dead horsie with a stick whipping up and down like a great big dick. Oooooooh."

  2. For moderatus and those of similar mind, having that strong desire to oversee other citizens' personal business for them does not make you a real conservative. It was none other than the founder of the conservative movement; the late Senator Barry Goldwater; who famously noted that "abortion is not a conservative issue; it's a matter between a woman and her doctor (to which I would add, and often her family)."  

    There is also the "little problem" that personhood is driven primarily by far right wing religious groups who also can't really be considered as conservative, in the tradition of real conservatives like Goldwater, Buckley, and even Reagan. The Colorado Constitution (Article II, Sec. 4) and the US Constitution (1st, and a little in the 14th amendments) provide for freedom of religion. And there is an implied right to privacy in your home, and with your person, in the 3rd & 4th amendments.

    Personhood is a direct religious attack upon the rights of Colorado women and families to control their own reproduction, by taking away the right to an abortion and various forms of contraception. Mr. Gardner's call for selling contraceptives "over the counter" has some merit, but his plan still requires that big government make personal decisions for citizens.

    As a traditional conservative Republican, I support individual rights, freedom of conscience, and religious liberty. Can Cory Gardner say the same? 

    Regards,

    Conservative Head Banger   (AC/DC Rules !)

    1. As a historical footnote, Southern Baptists of the '60's and '70's did not oppose abortion.  Quite the contrary:

      Once essentially pro-choice, the Southern Baptist Convention today stands firmly with pro-life evangelicals and Catholics on sanctity-of-life issues, including opposition to mandated coverage of contraceptives in the Affordable Care Act.

      Southern Baptist attorney Linda Coffee wrote a series of legal proceedings that led to the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973 establishing a woman’s right to abortion.

      “I tend to feel the state should be neutral on abortion because it should never appear either to sanction an abortion or to interfere improperly with a doctor-patient relationship,” Coffee, a member of Park Cities Baptist Church in Dallas, told Baptist Press. “But I would have little personal sympathy for use of abortion as a contraceptive or to avoid personal responsibility.”

      Protestant theology generally takes Genesis 2:7 as a statement that the soul is formed at breath, not with conception,” Dehoney said. “However, as Baptists believe in the priesthood of every believer to search the Scriptures, find truth and make moral decisions for themselves, we have differing views on the matter of birth control and the question of when life begins.”

      In 1971, the Southern Baptist Convention adopted a resolution supporting legislation to “allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental and physical health of the mother.”

      http://abpnews.com/culture/social-issues/item/28429-southern-baptist-convention-s-abortion-stance-moving-toward-birth-control-issues

       

  3.  Go Gender Gap! Gail Collins points out a national trend of Rs trying hide their true intentions, As I said earlier, Rethugs back over the counter birth control till the 1st week of Nov, then its back to liars choir

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

247 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!