U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 07, 2014 05:55 PM UTC

UN Liberals, Unicorn Bans, and Better Broadband—The Battle for Senate District 5

  • 8 Comments
  • by: ClubTwitty

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Senator Gail Schwartz, who has rather tirelessly worked on behalf of Senate District 5 is term-limited, and the battle to replace her is considered one of the top races this cycle for control of the Colorado Senate.  The contest is between Kerry Donavan, town councilor for Vail, and member of a long time Eagle County business and ranching family; and, Don Suppes the self-proclaimed “most conservative mayor” from Orchard City, an incorporated water district on the southern flanks of Grand Mesa, somewhere roughly between Delta and Cedaredge

The Club 20 debates yesterday not only included the marque races for Governor and U.S. Senator, and the second string races for CD 3 (Tipton, R-Worthless and Tapia, D-Pueblo, again) and CD 2 (featuring George Leing talking to himself), but a number of down ticket races as well including one shaping up to be a major battle in the fight to keep or take control of the state senate. 

Senate District 5–which includes Eagle, Lake, Gunnison, Chafee, Pitkin, and Delta counties–bridges the Divide: at the spine of the continent, as well as in the politics in western Colorado. 

Far from the ‘Republican stronghold’ some imagine it to be—western Colorado actually has classically divided politics: a number of areas are blue and trending bluer, even as the Republican strangleholds on places like Mesa and Moffat County increase.

And there is a strong sentiment toward being non-affiliated: which spans the range from conservative to liberal, and not always in familiar pairings.  A lot of folks like guns, and pot.  Your neighbors might be a changing band of hippies or survivalists bunkering down for the post-apocalypse.  Sometimes its the same group of people.  Its not a new thing and we like it that way.  We can be a little crusty, but most of us are friendly, and we help each other out.  

Both parties, and their allies, have identified this race as key to their state senate strategies.  The now defunct right-wing partisan blog ‘The Colorado Observer’ flagged it as one of seven senate races to watch, describing it in a rare moment of accuracy as:

[A] diverse district that also includes [in addition to Delta] voters in Chaffee, Eagle, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Lake and Pitkin counties. The district is comprised of 26,327 unaffiliated voters, 24,879 Republicans and 21,458 Democrats.

Don Suppes, SD5: Stumping on Agenda 21 

The ‘unaffiliated’ voters on Senate District 5—which includes Club Twitty—outnumber voters affiliated with either party.  They represent not only fringe righties or lefties or the muddled middle; they are—in many cases—either truly non-partisan (their ideas mix liberal and conservative thought), libertarian (both left and right versions), opposed on principal to affiliation, and/or genuinely unrepresented by either (or any) party.  Suppes seems to be going after at least one block of the unaffiliated voters, the wackadoo caucus.  Charles Ashby of the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel covers the action from the debate (article behind paywall, briefly excerpted below):  

Amendment 21 is a non-binding agreement about sustainable development and the environment that was the result of a United Nations conference in in 1992 in Brazil.

“You read Agenda 21, it reads the standard liberal playbook,” Suppes said. “Agenda 21 is just liberalism. If that makes me a conspiracy theorist then … I’m preaching that it’s liberalism.”

The Standard Liberal Playbook–can someone send me this?  I just made it through Rule for Radicals, again, and I’m thinking the two together could really give me some direction.  But I digress…

I'd ask for the link, but broadband in Delta County sucks.  Not that Suppes cares, he's busy fighting a mythical 'fracking ban’ as his solution to economic development, as Ashby reports:

“If I was looking to cripple the economy in western Colorado, I would do two things,” Suppes said. “I would shut down the coal industry and I would ban fracking. That’s what the Democrats are doing.”

Donovan said there are parts of the district, which stretches from Eagle to Hinsdale and Delta to Chaffee counties, that don’t have any broadband service.

Businesses, she said, would move there and create jobs if broadband existed.

Robocalls and Push Polls

Suppes has a robocall in the field right now that uses an elementary school teacher (sounding like one might imagine an elementary school teacher from the 1980s might sound—30 years later) praising Don’s character.  “He was a good boy.”

Now I want to pause here to acknowledge the importance of education, and give a shout out to good students that make a teacher’s job easier and help foster a productive learning environment.  But I am not looking for a polite classmate myself or an obedient student.  So I am not sure of the value of this particular pitch. 

I'm also not falling for the ‘War on Coal’ and ‘Ski Country elitist’ meme that Donavan’s opponents are spewing as Suppes basic angle of attack.  This has been backed up with at least one mailing in the district and a push poll from Magellan Strategies pollster’s Elkhurst Communications firm,routinely pilloried for its bad practices of intentionally phone-spamming voters.  

“I can be that voice. I wear ski boots and I wear cowboy boots” 

Kerry Donavan got off one of the better lines at the Club 20 debates—certainly in the down ballot races.  Challenged on her ability to represent the district she noted her backgrounds—ranching family, skier: “I wear ski boots and I wear cowboy boots,” she quipped.  It sums up the reality of this district and this race, and points to why Suppes is—hopefully—setting himself up for a fail.  

Donavan also talked about the importance of renewable energy to SD5.   This reflects a much deeper appreciation than the myopic view presented by Suppes—of coal mines and gas fields.  Indeed Senate District 5 is already a leader in the state—Paonia is home to Solar Energy International, Amory Lovin’s the Rocky Mountain Institute is just or ‘over the hill’ from there.  

While not considered renewable, it is an innovative and beneficial project that has brought the unlikely pairing of Aspen Ski Company, Holy Cross Electric, and Bill Koch’s Oxbow Carbon together to generate electricity from vented coal mine methane (which continues to vent from closed and abandoned mines for decades). 

Many of the ditches and other irrigation facilities best suited to the type of micro hydro made easier by Congressman Tipton’s legislation are in the 5th Senate District—which includes a run on the Arkansas, the headwaters of two forks of the Gunnison, the Roaring Fork, the Eagle and hundreds of tributaries—all of which feed thousands of irrigation facilities, ditches, pipes, and canals. 

Senate District 5 also includes several communities fighting to keep out incompatible industrial oil and gas development—like the Thompson Divide area and the agricultural heart of the North Fork—Colorado’s premier organic growing spot.

The balanced approach that Kerry Donavan brings suits SD 5 well —unlike the conspiratorial bantering of a ‘War on Coal’ and non-existent ‘fracking bans’ evoked by Don Suppes. 

Kerry recognizes that the path to economic prosperity in SD 5 is to diversify our economy and to provide the infrastructure we need to grow into the future.  Don Supples’ economic ‘strategy’ for is to double down on the kind of single-engine economy that put much of western Colorado in the doldrums to start, and to take inane pot-shots that border on crazy talk.  

Comments

8 thoughts on “UN Liberals, Unicorn Bans, and Better Broadband—The Battle for Senate District 5

  1. You all have a really clear choice in SD5.  Donavan seems like a great candidate, who will bring a wealth of experience and knowledge to the legislature, if elected.

    Now, if you all go for Suppes, the best you can hope for is that he will be a good boy who will play nice with others. Judging from the attack ads and push polls you're getting, maybe not so much.

    On another note, so you're saying Tipton's micro-hydropower  bill  has been helpful to folks in your district? I'm always so skeptical when I see a bill title like "Hydropower and Jobs Act", sponsored by a corporatist like Tipton, I think it's going to be something like "Sludge and Despair Decree" in reality.

    1. Hello Mr. Colorado polls, I was wondering if you plan on doing a full post on the new nbc marist poll that was released yesterday showing Gardner losing to Udall by 6 points?

  2. It took me a while to get in today.  None of the usual tricks worked.  

    But, yes, the hydro bills were truly bi-partisan.  House passed unanimously, our senators helped get through the Senate, passing on the consent agenda, in 2013.

    Small hydro bills pass

     

    Broad support in Congress for new energy reform

    By Collin McRann
    Staff reporter

    Published: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:20 PM CDT

    Two new hydropower bills have passed out of both chambers of Congress, giving supporters like Ophir’s Kurt Johnson hope that small hydro projects will soon be easier to implement.

    The aim of the bills is to simplify and streamline the federal regulatory process that small hydroelectric projects must go through to be approved. Since 2011, Johnson has been working to introduce and find support for small hydroelectric bills in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. There have been both victories and setbacks for small hydro reform legislation over the years. But with last week’s passage, Johnson, who is president of the Colorado Small Hydro Association, said the future of more widespread small hydroelectric power is looking bright.

    “This has eliminated what has been a huge barrier for decades,” Johnson said. “Both bills are going to accelerate small hydropower development. There’s a lot development opportunity out there. ”

    The Tipton bill was paired with a bill by Diana DeGette, and taken up in the Senate by SEns. Barrasso and Raisch, two western Republicans.  They got a strong assist from our own Senators.  Obama signed it into law, a fact touted by Mr. Tipton on his website via this link to the Cortez Journal.  That bi-partisan rascal! …may as well invite the UN in the backdoor.

    There was also bi-partisan bill passed through the state house and signed by Hickenlooper this year, that facilitated things on the state end.  

    Small hydro bill passes state legislature

     

    New rules will streamline small hydro development

    By Collin McRann
    Staff reporter

    Published: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:07 AM CDT

    A bill with local roots that aims to further streamline the approval process for small hydroelectric projects in Colorado has passed the state legislature.

    The Colorado State Senate passed HB14-1030 last week with a vote of 26-7 (minus two absent votes), and now it just needs the signature of Gov. John Hickenlooper to become law. The bill first passed the State House of Representatives in February with a near unanimous vote.

    Its purpose is to compliment the federal Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act signed by President Barack Obama in August of 2013. The Act lifted many regulatory requirements for hydro projects under 5 megawatts, and it is considered a major step forward for the development of small hydroelectricity.

    “This new bill in Colorado is similar to the federal legislation.It streamlines both the state regulatory agencies as well as the electrical specification progresses. That’s a big step,” said Ophir’s Kurt Johnson, who is president of the Colorado Small Hydro Association.

    That Sen. Schwartz sponsored it in the Senate and Republicans like Don Coram ran it in the House, one would think it might be the kind of thing a Republican would point to running in that geography, although if a UN threat is breathing down one's neck there is the matter of priorities.  

     

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

136 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!