"What frightens us most in a madman is his sane conversation."
–Anatole France
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Child Labor, That Classic Republican Blind Spot
BY: ParkHill
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: fow eyy
IN: No Odor in the Pod (feat. Christy Powell)
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Why republicans may not win the Senate: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/09/29/banana-republicans-stand-between-the-gop-and-the-senate/
Interesting article, denverco. My favorite quote:
In Hong Kong, they're filling not just the streets, but the highways, walking for democracy. Some had their hands up, in the "Ferguson" gesture. Can't embed the videos here, but they are worth a look.
Even the conservative press calls gardner a liar: http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/29/cory-gardner-denies-the-existence-of-a-bill-hes-cosponsoring/
Watch Gary Shapiro attempt to pin Cory Gardner down over Gov't shutdown, this morning on Ch 20 at 8:30AM "there was no bill to shutdown the Govt"
No, just planned maneuver to defund ACA, stuff that earned a 11% approval rating for polls
Kudos to Eli Stokols for being a good journalist on this.
Relentless
ok, I want our side to win, but the plain old incompetence and fear of being a plain old Dem is a chronic problem, especially at the national level.
Mark Udall is a prime example of someone who doesn't want anyone to notice the (D) behind his name. Doug Lamborn is a prime example of what happens when we let R's go unchallenged year after year.
These people should take a few hours and watch some Roosevelts in action. And they should start doing some of what the Hyde Park Roosevelts did to build and support America's Middle Class. This fear to lead is doing great harm to those whose lives depend on a little leadership from our "leaders".
The problem with Lamborn is not that he's gone unchallenged year after year, but that he has an extremely safe R District – sadly.
Democrats: Running away from leadership and messaging since _____ (fill in the blank – 1999? 1963?).
Maybe……..but, I see very little going on down here to counter Republican efforts. Yeah, I know, we're endangered here. But there is a party, there are activists and supporters, and there are some good candidates. Where are the big guns? Where's the state party? The national party?
IMHO, EPC can turn the whole state if local D's turn out.
I agree, Zap – state Dems are neglecting EPCO, and missing the best opportunity to turn EPCO blue (or at least purple) they have had in decades. With the rampant corruption (Maketa, Lowderman, Williams, Herpin) and prevalent insanity (Chaps, Lamborn), I would think Dems would be all over the county. But no.
Very few resources, for example, have come to Lois Fornander's campaign, although her opponent, Gordon Klingenschmitt, defines "right wing nut job". I was happy to see a fundraising email from Rick Palacio (Dem party chair) today calling out Lamborn and asking us to notice Irv Halter on the Maddow show tonight, but again, it is primarily a fundraising email for the Democratic party, and not a specific call for resources to aid General Halter.
El Paso County Democrats do turn this state. We are out numbered by right wingers and conservative independents who mindlessly vote for the borg people, so the county is run by the gop. But we do make a difference at the state level.
We are working hard for our candidates, and the ones we have are very good. Halter has a good shot at pulling this off. The military people do not like Lamborn, excepting for the gomers, of course, but their serum porcelain levels are off the charts.
Do not under estimate Democrats in El Paso County. The gop can, but not you all. The air is shifting here, but it may take a while for more people to understand that. More people are understanding that the health of our economy here depends on a fresh approach. We will turn this county. Of course, you dollars would be greatly appreciated.
Your dollars, our candidates can use all the help they can get.
But Zap is right about Dems coming cross as embarrassed to be Dems and mistakenly believe that Americans mean it when they say less partisanship is a high priority for them. It isn't. Republicans are fiercely partisan and have had great success with that.
Dems, from Obama on down, who are afraid to call out Republicans as extremists because they want to sound all hands across the aisle, let's drum circle our way to swell solutions, come across as weak, less confident in and proud of their policies. Less proud of being Dems than Rs are of being Rs. The most aggravating thing is when the overwhelmingly centrist Democratic party is blamed equally with Rs by Dem pols for impasses. We her hear Dem pols, once again from Obama on down, talk about "extremists on both sides" or "too much partisanship on both sides" which is total bull.
It's 99% on one side, the Republican side. They're the ones who hold their breath until they turn blue or shut down the government when they can't get their way via the legitimate democratic process. They're the ones who refuse to vote for policies that were their own 15 minutes ago and came from their own think tanks as soon as Obama supports those same policies just to deny him any victories.
And most important, yes, they are the party for which crazy tinfoil hat conspiracy theories of all kinds have gone mainstream. Dems don't do a better job of calling them out because they think that would be perceived as too partisan. When did the current crop of Republican pols ever worry about appearing too partisan? Never. They take every opportunity to go on offense which puts Dems on perpetual defense. It's high time we started seeing ads from Dems showing the public exactly what wacky things these extremists believe and that even the most "moderate" of Rs tolerate in the candidates they support. It's time to stop worrying about looking partisan. It's time to stop worrying, period, and get out there and kick ass.
The truth is the 21st century Republican party is the most extremely partisan and monolithic party in our history and the 21st century Democratic Party is the big tent party of moderation and compromise. Dem candidates need to let the public know how one sided the rejection of a functional congress that works together to solve problem really is. Most of all it's time to stop worrying about being Dems and start being proud of it. It's not the end of the Reagan era any more. We don't have to be triangulating, Republican lite, almost as conservative as the conservatives any more to get elected. For one thing conservatives back then weren't the total nutbags they are now.
Strength and confidence goes over way better than ineffective "niceness"
Agree. Rs trumpet how superior they are. Dems too often go with, we're not as bad. Hardly a ringing, to the ramparts, inspirational message. It wasn't always that way.
Dems are still suffering from Reagan era shell shock. Clinton got elected with the whole DLC, triangulating , we're almost as responsible and conservative as Republicans thing. That was necessary then. It isn't now.
More than two decades during which all that Republican and Republican lite "fiscal responsibility" have completely stalled the economy for the middle class (good article on that in today's Post business section, of all places) have changed the landscape and Dems need the guts to change with it.
People didn't vote for Obama because people wanted him to be the King of playing nice with the Rs. They voted for him because they were sick to death of the Rs and wanted change. Everybody is pretty much over that now. That was an unusual election. What's most consistent in our elections is that Americans tend to vote for strength and conviction, even in the service of crappy policy.
yes, BC, and this is the bottom line that bears repeating:
AIG’s lawsuit against the Federal Reserve epitomizes the word chutzpah.
Our infant mortality rate is a national embarrassment
And it's all because of the party of "life."
I think we can retire that "land of opportunity" notion.
Amen.
Here is one of my very first diaries, "Bitter Harvest" – with sobering statistics about childhood poverty and family struggles in Gardner's CD-4. Given his penchant for ignoring the most challenged of his constituents in eastern Colorado while he kneels at the alter of Koch, Inc. makes him wholly unfit to represent CD-4, let alone the entire state.
I was looking for something else, but I came across this information on the Wikipedia page for the Colorado 2010 race, and wonder if anybody has any thoughts. In 2010, the last off-year Senate election in Colorado, Bennet v. Buck, of the last 22 publicly released polls, taken August 1 through October 30, 17 showed Buck leading, 3 showed a tie, and only 2 had Bennet ahead. Only one poll, the last one, had Bennet getting as much as 48% of the vote, which was his final tally, but even that one had him losing. Only 5 of the polls showed Buck with 46% or less (his eventual total), and of those 5, 3 had him winning.
Are the polls better calibrated this year? Was there something unique about 2010 that made it difficult to poll? Are the pollsters full of shit?
Good questions. Things might be becoming more unpredictable. Certainly Silver and Wang have changed up the game quite a bit. But thinking of Scotland, I wonder what the bookies are doing here.
BTW, Colpols, I still can't access "My Comments". It thinks for a short bit and then I get the blank page.
At least the NFL pretty immediately backtracked.
Apparently, it was the slide? Whatever.
Really?!! The Nuggets had better figure this out quick.
"Even Rocky has first amendment rights," says jackass Ryan Call. Stupidest thing I've read all day.
Maybe that stuffed feline is a corporation???
Did you guys catch this little gem earlier today?:
GOP Bid To Paint Mark Udall As 9/11 Truther Backfires Spectacularly
link to most plausible explanation of collapse of all 3 WTC buildings grimhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/08/120809133801.htm reading
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/08/120809133801.htm
I often wondered why CPT 12 used the truther's as a fund raising tool.
It fits right in with their large Independence Institute demographic?? — would be my guess . . .
wrong link, sorry… this is correct link details how explosive Aluminum is when molten (30 tonnes) & in contact with rusty water, large amts of slag on nearby bldgs http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110921074747.htm
interesting theory…worth reading..
Thanks, Dan…
Yet another reason to feel very good about our chances to hold Senator Udall's seat — and the Senate as a whole — in November. Highly recommended reading. Share it with your Dem friends!
Democrats Are Spending More on the Ground in Key Senate Races – NYTimes.com
And finally, one more compelling reason why we all must work relentlessly, non-stop, tirelessly, to destroy the anti-democracy/anti-American GOTP in every election and at every level of governance:
How the Supreme Court will continue helping GOP game elections – The Washington Post
Well Ebola virus has made landfall in the United States. And look where…..the state that gave the world Dick Armey, Tom Delay, Rick Perry, Raphael Cruz, Louie Gohmert, and the adopted home of the Bush family. Here's hoping the Texas health care system works better than their criminal justice and education systems.
Bet it's already all over wacko rightie media as having come over the southern border. And don't tell them any different. Anything different is just another Muslim brotherhood conspiracy.