U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 04, 2009 11:10 PM UTC

Ritter's Gift to Republicans

  • 76 Comments
  • by: harrydoby

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Engineering has a principle called KISS — Keep It Simple Stupid.  I guess there is no corollary in the law or in Ritter’s experience.  Choose the most qualified, experienced, skilled and willing candidate who can run a campaign, serve the constituency well and keep getting elected.  Every opposition candidate’s nightmare.

Ritter had at least a half-dozen candidates that fit the bill.  

Ok, so Ritter’s contrary enough to reject the easy way to solidify Democratic party gains in Colorado.  What’s next?

The race for both the Governor’s office and this Senate seat in ’10 has already begun.  It’s going to be extraordinarily expensive and bloody, I believe. Unnecessarily so IMO — but, so be it.

Presuming Bennet is not a placeholder (or a bone tossed at the other senate hopefuls to keep them out of the Governor’s race), what can he do to win his first election?

It seems Bennet’s fate will be tied to Obama’s, not so much Ritter’s (the ‘pubs will try to do both anyway, particularly to whomever is the weaker politically).  So he should join himself to Obama’s hip by being seen bringing federal dollars to Colorado in the way of energy, transportation, educational infrastructure and defense projects (especially to the Western Slope or the ‘burbs) with full PR fanfare is paramount.

Appealing to independents by being on the forefront of fixing NCLB through common sense measurement standards, while maintaining accountability; working to improve accountability and efficiency in government, and modernizing our information systems for greater visibility and accountability (healthcare, education and open government budgeting).

Leave the bleeding heart liberal issues to the other candidates (even if some are near and dear to many of us, they’ll either get done or not depending on the economy and the labors of the other 57 (D) Senators).  Bennet doesn’t need to lead on those.

With his connections, and political insider experience, I suspect he’ll have plenty of people to draw upon to fill both his Senate staff as well as his campaign staff.  He’s plenty sharp to know what talent he’ll need to support the Herculean challenges he faces in the coming 24 months.

I think fundraising will be the least of Bennet’s problems.  Thank goodness for small favors!

I don’t know that 24 months (or about 2 weeks, depending on when you start counting) will be long enough for anyone, no matter how talented, to build the organization and track record to win re-election.  So the doors are wide open to not just every Republican, but to many highly qualified Democrats that smell blood in the water.

It’s probably too much to hope that Dick Wadhams will deliver another election to us on a silver platter.  We are about to find out just how “Blue” Colorado has become.

 

Tweet
Share

Comments

76 thoughts on “Ritter’s Gift to Republicans”

  1. Seems unlikely to me, but I’m not a Dem.

    Will GOP have a primary?

    I’m not a Repub, but seems likely.

    Can the Republicans come up with a candidate who has both good name recognition in the state and a reputation for being more than a political hack?

    Seems unlikely, but we can hope.

  2. So Ritter’s charge was to “solidify Democratic party gains” in Colorado?  

    I think not, and why should he worry about Party concerns?  The party, if I remember correctly, was late in jumping on his bandwagon, desperately searching all the while for someone they REALLY liked to run as Gov.  He won w/ a more centrist coalition, one he still plays to.

    The Bennet pick is very much consistent w/ Ritter’s  evident philosophy.  Bennet will also have to run from that same centrist place – Colorado is purple, not blue.  He’ll have the war chest, organization, and smarts to win in 2010.  I predict no primary.

    2. Yes actually, it is…

      In our purple state, the notion of having two Democratic Senators may not sit particularly well, regardless of their effectiveness.  

      Having a running start on a campaign staff, and a purple legislative record such as several of the other candidates (my favorite being Romanoff) would have made that particular Republican talking point a tough sell.

      Given enough time, Bennet could prove himself to the majority of Coloradans, but doing it from a standing start from day 1 may be too difficult for even a superman.

      Voters may seek “balance” by voting in a Republican with an established organization and name recognition, even if it’s against their best interests (e.g. Tancredo).

  3. …unless something major happens (along the lines of a Republican-style sex scandal), Bennet won’t face a serious primary challenge.  Hell, Ritter, Salazar, Salazar, and Udall just endorsed Bennet for 2010.  What serious Dem would volunteer to run against that brick wall?  Career suicide is not a noble cause.

    2. But I don’t see that as a brick wall.  All it takes is money and you’ve got a primary.  A continued flow of endorsements (particularly by the monied and/or the potential challengers) will tell us if a primary will happen.

      Can’t speak to the Republican side, but Suthers doesn’t seem that formidable to me.  Again, money and party support/discipline seem to be a big question mark in this unsettled time.

  4. We can all come up with someone we think would have been better. But I don’t see it being a big difference.

    First off, one of the most successful Dem politicians in the state picked Bennet. Based on his track record I’m going to trust that Ritter’s selection is solid.

    Second, while Bennet does not have a campaign staff, he’ll get a good one very fast. And he also does not have a voting record that the Republican’s would twist out of context and then hammer him on.

    The guy also effected wrenching change in DPS without everyone turning out with torches & pitchforks to crucify him. That shows tremendous political skill.

    1. Bennet was the tool of BDM which demanded and got the change…there was no power or money for anyone to oppose him….a bunch of poor kids got thrown to the wind…that doesn’t take political skill……it would have taken personal integrity NOT to toss the poorly perfoming kids to the four winds….Bennet took the easy way out.

      Have you ever been to Denver?  You take the Boulder Turnpike east, turn south on I25 and get off at Speer.  You could visit a DPS school. Even talk to someone who actually has had contact with Bennet et.al, who is not a rich, politically well connected dem….

      1. I suspect it’s dead wrong, but that doesn’t matter. Is it widely held among minority or other groups in Denver? He can’t have a hole in his base, or he’s sunk from day one.

        1. The minority community, IMHO, is well integrated into the so-called power structure.  The social structure in Denver is very different from that of Boulder.  There are not independent minority advocate groups.  The suggestion that there are or that they have any power, independently,  is simply not true.  Their leaders, if any, are part of the so-called “power elite.” Pena was the first Hispanic mayor of Denver years ago. He carried the Obama banner well.  Webb was the first black mayor and he was a strong Clinton supporter.

          When Manual High School was closed, a group of black ministers showed up at the BOE meeting, sang “We shall overcome” to protest the closing….and then nothing else happened…..

          Poor kids in Denver don’t have groups which support them.  Many of them are the childlren of illegals and the parents are scared to be vocal or visible.  There are various funded groups which posture to speak for these kids, but they go along to get along….

          My anger at Dave, and I should apologize for the harshness of my tone, is that Bennet is not a hero for closing schools.  He didn’t close schools where rich kids go.  He closed the schools with large minority and poor populations.  He established a committee which had everyone and his brother on it…including Pena and Webb…to make recommendations on which schools to close.  That is how you “co-op” the minority community..

          Now, closing schools may well have been necessary; however, what pisses me off is that Bennet did not plan for transition with these kids.  He tossed the kids into new configurations which may or may  not work.  In Bennet’s DPS, the plans are always for the kids who might come tomorrow, not for the kids caught in the mishmash today.   Let me give you an example,  he closed some schools and consolidated the population in another school which has elementary kids walking further to get to school across Leetsdale, one of Denver’s most dangerous streets. Sadly, a high school student was killed crossing that street a few months ago.  Some parents protested, that is why I even know about it.  But poor parents in DPS have no power.

          I don’t like Bennet, but I have no illusions about what kind of power he will now yield.  You see, I live in Denver. I know what power smells like.

  5. Suthers has already announced and is apparently already putting together a campaign/fundraising team.  Given that he’s already run and won statewide, he’s probably doing enough to scare off any serious (ie: who cares what tancredo does) challenge.  McInnis can’t contend in a primary, Beauprez can’t win a general, and Dan Caplis is, well, Dan Caplis.  Did I miss anyone legit?

      1. there was some truth to that when Suthers first became AG, but over the past few years he’s gotten markedly better.  He’s no Obama, but much better and actually quite entertaining.  Suthers suffers from being a genuine, honest person  – he hates fluffy rhetoric and red meat speeches that have no substance.  I’m guessing he’ll overcome that during the Senate race.

      2. We’ve got so many inarticulate politicians in this state that another one won’t make much of a difference.

        Suther’s a former DA. What does he know about the real world?

        I hope to get a chance to hear him speak sometime soon.

        1. I think DAs get more exposure to “the real world” than the rest of us. They see greed, hate, poverty, and the ugly side of the world much more than those of us who live our peaceful middle-class lives.

          If you mean he doesn’t have experience in the private sector, that’s another issue altogether. Suthers has worked in law firms as well as prosecutorial positions, so he has experience in private as well as public law offices.

  7. From 1997:

    Susan Diane Daggett, a daughter of Patricia B. Palmer of Little Rock, Ark., and Jesse B. Daggett of Marianna, Ark., was married yesterday to Michael Farrand Bennet, a son of Douglas J. Bennet Jr. of Middletown, Conn., and Susanne K. Bennet of Washington. The Rev. Arnold W. Hearn, an Episcopal priest, performed the ceremony at Crystal Lake in Marianna.

    The bride, 33, a lawyer, is to join the Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, formerly the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, in Denver next month. Ms. Daggett, who is keeping her name, graduated magna cum laude from Mount Holyoke College, and she and the bridegroom received law degrees from Yale University.

    Her mother is a painter and an instructor at the Arkansas Art Center’s Museum School in Little Rock. Her father is a partner in Daggett, VanDover, Donovan & Perry, a Little Rock law firm.

    Mr. Bennet, 32, was until recently a counsel to the Deputy Attorney General of the United States. He graduated with honors from Wesleyan University.

    His father is the president of Wesleyan; he was the Assistant Secretary of State for international organizations in 1993 and 1994 and the president of National Public Radio from 1983 until 1992. The bridegroom’s mother is an art historian specializing in Roman antiquities.  

    1. I rue the day a son of NPR became my senator.  What, will he drone on forever about nothing in pretentious tones?  Will he advocate that old bag Nina Totenberg for the Supreme Court?!  I withdraw the millions I already donated on Bennet’s fabulously modern website.

      3. NPR is the only national organization to bring us in depth and/or unique stories.

        But the people drive me nuts.  All that elitist tone. That’s why the Pubs hate NPR.  It can’t be for the generally neutral content.  

        1. Listening to him at the press conference, I had wondered where he picked up the accent.  I didn’t ask anyone because I was afraid it may be a speech impediment and didn’t want to draw attention to it.  

          1. A few years ago there was a liberal talk host with either the most horrendous NY accent or a speech impediment.  I think her first name was Laura.

            I honestly could not listen to her the accent/impediment was so bad. Every few wads, excuse me, words, came another moment.  

            Yet, I’ve wondered if it was an impediment.

                  1. …you really should know basic info about Ariana.  Before her Huffington Post stardom, she starred as First Beard of California for several years.

    2. where that came from. It’s the Bennets’ wedding announcement from the New York Times (which says something right there, he’s probably the only office-holder in Colorado whose nuptials got a Times write-up).

  8. As long as a statewide candidate has a D by their name, they are going to win. I keep telling you guys this is a blue state, but you keep acting like one has to make decisions with the Republicans in mind.

      2. I’m not suggesting the Democrats act stupid because they don’t have to think about Republicans, I’m saying they shouldn’t act stupid thinking they DO have to think about Republicans, like they usually do. They would be well served to pursue good policy, which isn’t far left policy and will keep voters satisfied enough.

  9. Anyone know if he spent time in Boulder? If he’s a liberal?

    Nobody’s won a first-time election in Colorado for years without being one or both.

    I smell exciting Democratic primary in 2010! And it smells like patchouli…

    1. those notorious Boulder liberals Ken Salazar and Bill Ritter?

      Speaking of patchouli, Mike Miles should grow some balls and declare he’s challenging Bennet, otherwise his supporters are going to go crazy.

  10. …that I will stand on street corners for, make hundreds of personal calls, and knock on doors for, should they announce for US Senate:

    Bob Schaffer

    Mike May

    David Balmer

    Jerry Sonnenberg

    Matt Smith

    Stella Garza Hicks

    The above six people are AWESOME, hard working, LOVE COLORADO, and top quality — I’m throwing some major wild cards in there (Sonnenberg, Garza Hicks) but wanted to show some public love for those that I want leading our Party in the future

    I’ve never personally met John Suthers, but he surrounds himself with good people, which reflects well on him

    Caplis and Eid look like good folks, but again, they’ve never ran for office before… I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… running for HD56 was much harder than I thought… good luck to any political-novice that thinks they can run for US Senate as their first race… that’s just a recipe for disaster… seriously, at least run for County School Board first and knock on a few hundred doors… you’ll either love it or hate it, but it’s terrible to have that epiphany during a US Senate race

    Lastly — I’m definitely a socially-liberal Republican, but I’m getting really sick of ‘moderate’ Republicans who dramaqueen that our Party is too right wing — my message to those ‘moderates’ is to shut up and run, like I did… I believe our Republican Party should be more socially-liberal and inclusive, but I ran to make that change, I didn’t sit in a big office in Denver and dramqueen… that’s the only way we’ll change our Party

    peace and love all!  

          1. Like she did one thousand times before?

            I don’t know about you, but after the first five hundred times, I’m changing the locks.

            –from some standup comic whose name I forget

    2. that you get the opportunity to stand on street corners for any of those Senate candidates, but especially Bob “Third Time’s a Charm!” Schaffer or David “Varsity Soccer” Balmer.

      You’ve really got to get your father to write some $350,000 checks to the state party so you’ll have more influence. Seriously.

      1. The way I see our dominoes stacking, the GOP’s shit list of candidates is our only hope.

        Seriously, at least he’s branching out.  Local news is still only tossing out Tanc and McInnis.  Hmm, maybe I am worried for nothing 🙂

      2. clarification point – that money was all mine

        I’m proud of our campaign — our spending and transactions were honest and transparent, with no 527 money, or dirty-campaign tactics, involved

        No win… but we worked hard for that 47% and got there without going negative

        I’ll always always always be proud of that

    3. She does not meet your own criteria. You say it would be “a recipe for disaster” to have “never ran for office before.” Hicks never has. She was appointed to the state house in 2006 and did not run for reelection.

      1. she’s served – she’s looked at lists and understands how it runs

        I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt, but nonetheless, your point is well taken

        women-wise, Amy Stephens is another wonderful candidate — very energetic and very intelligent — I’d be happy to volunteer time for her

        1. has a lot of friends right now in the Republican caucus, especially one of your other candidates, Mike May.  What about Bill Owens?  I can’t believe he won’t take this shot…it’s the best one he will have.

          1. Don’t try to dissuade him from getting David “Where Am I?” Balmer to run. And for a bonus, Amy Stephens in an apocalyptic smack-down of a primary.

            The Colorado Republicans are going the way of the Tories after their first rout — deeper into the caricature that got them into trouble in the first place. I say, why stop ’em?

  11. .

    Evan Dryer, Bill Ritter said weeks ago that the appointment would be used for the good of the State, not the good of the Party.  

    Look it up.

    Ritter apparently thought that it was important enough to do something about the problems the nation faces to appoint the person who he thought would do the best job.  

    If you put the good of the Party ahead of the good of the Nation, then these last few days at Colorado Pols make sense.

    Otherwise, not so much.

    .  

    1. … but I also make no bones about the fact that we could have had the best of both worlds (from my admittedly partisan point-of-view).

      As I and many others have pointed out, serving the best interests of Colorado and the nation with a similar brilliant dedication to a middle-of-the-road record could have been accomplished by a few other candidates without the risk of intra-party in-fighting that this appointment poses.

      1. I appreciate your perspective, but do you seriously think if Ritter had tapped Hickenlooper, Perlmutter or Romanoff, that we would’ve been spared intra-party in-fighting? That’s a sincere question, but I also have an answer in mind.

        1. … that knowingly or not, Ritter may have given this “gift” a 2010 expiration date.  I’m ready to support Michael Bennet, but yes, I do feel the struggle for re-election would have been vastly less, and for equal, if not better results, policy-wise.

  12. When Vern Buchanan was elected two years ago he called the RNC and asked for the names of the best congressional aides from losing districts.

    He picked up experienced, top notch aides in a few days.  No learning curve beyond how to spell “Buchanan.”  Damned smart.

    Although I’m a die hard liberal Democrat, Vern is unpredictable enough to like, grudgingly.  He refused the White House free knee pads and goes his own way.  I can live with that.  

      1. Granted Dem ex-aides are in short supply since we are on a winning streak.  But surely a few races were lost somewhere and he could pick up that experience.  

        1. between the supply of staff from defeated Democrats and the demand for staff by newly elected Dems …

          But if Bennet wants to reach across the aisle, he can have his pick of Musty’s, Tancredo’s, or Allard’s staff. Just sayin’.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

87 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!