U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 08, 2016 10:23 AM UTC

The Great Coffman/Trump Backfire: Just Ask Tom Tancredo

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Tom Tancredo, Mike Coffman in happier times.
Tom Tancredo, Mike Coffman in happier times.

Lots of discussion continuing today about last week’s ad from embattled GOP Rep. Mike Coffman of Aurora, in which Coffman declares he “doesn’t care much” for Donald Trump–an ad followed up by multiple news reports clarifying that no, it doesn’t mean Coffman won’t vote for Trump. At this point, Coffman’s ambiguity on the bottom-line question about this ad has been seen by many more people than will see the original ad, which calls the whole exercise into question in terms of Coffman inoculating himself against a likely anti-Trump wave at the polls this year.

But there’s another side of the equation as well: by publicly dissing Trump, even without specifically saying he won’t vote for Trump, Coffman risks angering a substantial portion of the Republican base in CD-6–without whom he cannot reasonably expect to be re-elected. Coffman’s advisors have obviously factored for this in their planning, and determined that the benefits of distance from Trump outweigh the risks to Coffman’s base coalition.

Apropos, this weekend Coffman took heavy fire at the pro-Trump conservative site Breitbart News by none other than his own predecessor in Congress, conservative lightning rod former Rep. Tom Tancredo.

Congressman Mike Coffman on Thursday released a paid television ad attacking Donald Trump but saying he may hold his nose and vote for him.

Coffman has also said he would not rule out voting for the Johnson-Weld Libertarian Party ticket. Predictably, the Denver Post again displayed its desire to “help” Republicans by praising Congressman Coffman’s decision to attack Trump. The Post asserts Coffman’s action is good for the GOP. Yeah, right…

Here’s a news flash for the Post’s editorial board. If Trump were polling well in Coffman’s District, you would see and hear only glowing praise for The Donald from the political chameleon, Mike Coffman.

Mike Coffman promising to “stand up” to Trump is like a french fry promising to stand up to a cheeseburger. It’s probably no coincidence that Coffman made his anti-Trump statement a few days after returning from the Koch brothers’ anti-Trump Billionnaires Bash at the Broadmoor Hotel in Colorado Springs. There’s nothing like the smell of hard cash to lubricate a politician’s sense of moral outrage…

I have known Mike Coffman for almost 20 years and welcomed his successful race for my congressional seat when I retired in 2008. If I believed for a millisecond that Coffman had, indeed, said what he said about Trump out of a sense of patriotic duty, I could forgive, and maybe even applaud, that decision. Sadly, I know better: Mike Coffman is the worst kind of opportunist. The only thing authentic about him is his passionate desire to keep that House Member pin on his lapel. [Pols emphasis]

Tancredo’s attack on Coffman in this guest op-ed is unusually cogent for a man who has built his reputation on far-right blowhard rhetoric. By calling out Coffman’s attacks on Trump as politically opportunistic and based only on a desire for re-election, Tancredo undermines Coffman’s entire “reinvention” into a candidate compatible with a diverse and competitive district. Combine that with tearing down Coffman’s conservative credentials among the Republican voters Coffman still needs to win, and this is a severely damaging message from a man Coffman once called his “hero.”

Coffman’s ability to thread the political needle in recent years is legendary. But this time, he may well have outsmarted himself.

Comments

7 thoughts on “The Great Coffman/Trump Backfire: Just Ask Tom Tancredo

  1. This is exactly what I've been telling people. Coffman loses more support than he gains by shitting on Trump. This will be a net loss of votes and could cost him the race.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

54 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!