( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
I’m not exactly thrilled to see Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) using his platform to try to derail health care reform and potentially end the best chance for universal health care in American history. But more than “not exactly thrilled,” I’m confused.
I seem to remember Jared campaigning aggressively in support of a single-payer health care system. I seem to remember ass-cheek-bearing campaign ads about his commitment to that. I also seem to remember him saying he supported a payroll tax increase to pay for that single-payer system. All of those memories I recall with fondness, because that’s basically what I support.
So here’s what I don’t get – how can Jared say he specifically opposes the Obama health care plan because it raises taxes? The very plan Jared campaigned for office on raises taxes, too – and it raises taxes on the very same businesses he says he’s worried about. In fact, the way I read it, Jared supported a tax that probably would have hit far more middle-income businesses than the Obama plan, which would tax only those citizens/businesses making more than a quarter-million dollars a year. Indeed, the plan Jared says he’s opposed to on tax grounds would only levy new taxes on 2 percent of all Americans and 5 percent of all small businesses, whereas the plan Jared campaigned for would have imposed “a 4.75% Medicare payroll tax” for all employers, regardless of income.
Now, I guess it’s possible Jared’s opposition to a millionaire’s tax could be based on the tax’s breadth – in other words, I guess it’s possible Jared wants to see more middle-income businesses pay higher taxes as he originally campaigned for, rather than just the wealthiest citizens and businesses. That would explain his opposition to the Obama health care plan in a way that would at least be consistent with his campaign promises and platform…except, it wouldn’t be consistent with his new lament, which is that the Obama health care plan raises taxes.
So I’m back to being confused. Jared campaigned on a promise to try to raise taxes to pay for universal health care, and is now opposing the Obama health care plan because it would raise taxes to pay for universal health care. That position suggests a massive flip flop by Boulder’s newest congressman.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: QuBase
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Anyone see Gov. Ritter’s comments at the National Governor’s association Summer meeting on the healthcare plan? He joined other govs—particularly bill richardson–in expressing concern over cost and unfunded mandates to the states
Also – The way the Colorado budget looks right now – we can’t afford any increase in medicare mandates. Out of control, unfunded mandates for medicare are part of the reason that the state budget looks as terrible as it does.
If that is all he is saying, I don’t think he is in the same league as Polis – who is opposing health care in opposition to a campaign platform. Ritter is concerned of an increased burden on an already stressed state budget.
Of course, we shouldn’t even have separate Medicare, Medicaid, VA, Tricare, etc.
You legally live here? You have medical coverage.
Of course, we shouldn’t even have separate Medicare, Medicaid, VA, Tricare, etc.
You legally live here? You have medical coverage.
.
“Collective fear stimulates herd instinct and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd.” -Bertrand Russell
Polis is the guy behind poorly thought out, poorly written amendment 41 that required clarification for ordinary low level state workers to know whether or not their kids could accept merit scholarships they earned fair and square.
It’s been a huge pain in the ass and guess what? Big money finds its way over, under and around all obstacles anyway. It’s like air. 41 mainly just makes nickel and dime stuff hard. Never was much reason to expect coherence, practicality, common sense or concern for the little guy from Polis.
It’s a safe district. Dems there could have had anyone they wanted. Now they’ve got Polis for as long as he wants.
…who actually wrote 41, I believe?
It was a dog.
I voted against it, as did many of my Dem friends, the kind who know a lot more about these things (and local politics in general) than I do and whose judgement I respect.
I will personally pledge the maximum donation to any progressive who wants to primary Polis.
He won his primary election with barely 40% of the vote. He’s not remotely safe in the next election.
You can buy yourself an election, but you can’t buy a re-election. People do kick assholes out of office once in a while.