Colorado Public Radio’s Caitlyn Kim reports today on the push from Democratic members of Congress from Colorado and Secretary of State Jena Griswold to encourage other states to adopt our state’s highly successful–and much safer from a social distancing perspective–mail ballot election system:
“If we do not act as a nation very quickly, Americans who are Republicans, Democrats, and Independents will all be faced with the question: ‘Do I go into a crowded polling location and risk my health, or do I sit home and not vote?’” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who has been talking up the Colorado model of all-mail voting in recent months.
Moving to all-mail voting takes money, for everything from new machinery to postage. Congress did earmark $400 million in the CARES Act to help with the 2020 elections, money states could use for these efforts. But the Election Assistance Commission, which distributes the funds, said states only get the money they put up a match 20 percent out of their own budgets. It’s a tough ask when many states are looking to slash spending this year amid the coronavirus-related recession.
Democratic Rep. Joe Neguse of Boulder has introduced legislation to get rid of the match requirement. He said it’s a vestige from an earlier election funding bill and not something Congress ever intended to include in the CARES Act.
It’s important to start with a reminder that nothing being proposed at the federal level by Colorado lawmakers or anyone else that we know of would mandate the use of mail ballots in states that don’t want to adopt the system. Rep. Joe Neguse’s legislation, accompanied in the Senate with a bill from Colorado’s senior Sen. Michael Bennet, and GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, is about providing funding for mail ballots for states that want to make the switch.
There is a problem, of course. President Donald Trump, facing a significant possibility of being defeated in the November election, has seized on mail ballots as a way to preemptively undermine legitimacy of the election in the event he loses–despite an absence of any evidence that mail ballots result in a higher rate of either error or mischief than any other method.
The night-and-day difference between Trump’s alarm over mail ballots and Colorado’s uncontroversial success implementing them is putting local Republicans in a very difficult position. Sen. Cory Gardner, who won his seat in 2014 in the first general election test of Colorado’s new mail ballot system, knows perfectly well that mail ballots work.
But as one of Trump’s closest allies, he’s not able–or willing–to say so:
Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner, a couple of weeks after the passage of the CARES Act, said that it should be a state decision.
“Washington, D.C. should not run the state’s elections,” he told Politico. “If a state determines that’s the way it wants to go, a state should make that decision.”
Well folks, that’s exactly what Colorado Democrats are proposing! This is not about forcing mail ballots on states that don’t want them. It’s about exporting Colorado’s success to states that do–and if that doesn’t ring like a line from a Gardner re-election commercial, what does?
Don’t hold your breath of course. As long as Trump needs this allegation in his back pocket for November, we expect Gardner will stay muzzled on the matter of mail ballots. And we all hope, though for very different reasons, that the margin in November will be big enough to render these questions moot.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: QuBase
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Colorado Leads on [ISSUE HERE] (Without Cory Gardner)
FIFY
(Without Cory Gardner & with opposition from state legislative Republicans)
FIFY … some more
I have a black friend in Atlanta who stood in line this morning for 3.5 hours in Dekalb County (Atlanta, where he's voted over the past decade) and when it was his turn he was informed that he was registered in Fulton County now.
This is not an accident, nor is it incompetence; this is voter suppression. Oddly the majority-white counties are having no issues.
In Georgia, primary day snarled by long lines, problems with voting machines — a potential preview of November
I’m not a big fan of Stacey Abrams, for my own reasons. I also believe that the Georgia gubernatorial election in 2018 was stolen from her by the winner, who just happened to be the GA secretary of state at the time, and in charge of the election.
The US Constitution, and over 200 years of constitutional case law, says one person, one vote. Not sure why some have a problem with this. It seems pretty clear to this constitutional conservative.
p.s. your link is behind the Washington Post’s pay wall. I already subscribe to the Denver Post and parts of the NY Times.
Yesterday one of my hysterical Dumphuckistan friends commented that 'the blacks' were trying to overturn our constitutional government. My reply was 'the blacks' are simply trying to get our constitutional government to live by its preamble.
Tucker Carlson lives in NE Colorado??! . . .
. . . makes sense.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5edf056ac5b6948cbc5c8d0f
Tucker’s the kind of guy you want to take on a snipe hunting expedition in remote Yuma County.
I'm guessing he is tough as nails and real savvy out in the woods….nah, just kidding.
😄
Not really. The Nebraska sand sharks would eat him alive!
I hope this is a mistake we'll actually learn from and never, ever repeat: