“Society is always taken by surprise at any new example of common sense.”
–Ralph Waldo Emerson
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Thorntonite
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: If There is Actual Election Fraud, It’s Always a Republican
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Wong21fr
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: allyncooper
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: allyncooper
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
"It’s amazing how much of Republican politics is just old people complaining about young people." Ian Milhiser
Deleted. Placed in wrong thread.
MAGA: Make Attorneys Get Attorneys
And how is the defense of Trump working out? It isn't just the money.
Is Habba the parking garage lawyer?
For all of you that are very very smart – Why Smart People Believe Stupid Thing
Do you actually read the articles you link to, David T.?
If you do read them, do you agree with this statement from the "Smart People / Stupid Thing (sic) " article?
If you don't agree with it, why post it without comment? If you do agree with it, please defend it and explain how white men are victimized by "woke-ism".
Guess you didn't read the article all that closely either. The extremes are 1619 and 1776. The answers lie somewhere in the middle.
1619 and 1776? So between the time the first slave landed on the shores of the Continental US, and the signing of the Declaration of Independence? What in the world does this have to do with the idea that white men are victimized by "woke-ism"?
BTW, neither 1619 nor 1776 is mentioned in the article David linked to. So what do 1619 and 1776 mean to you?
White men being white men, kwtree.
Being in the center is the safe place some decide to occupy. You can pass blame in either direction…
Original Americans don't give a fuck for the whole debate. Who is talking about reparations for the families of the Comanche or the Nez Perce? There is no excuse for the murderous history of Europeans and particularly "Christian" Europeans. Simply none.
And for their apologists…
Forgive them…they are blind and cannot see.
Maybe you're the one who needs his prescription checked, Duke.
For the record…I don't have any prescriptions. I am very healthy…and cognizant enough to recognize half-assed, centrist horse shit when I see it.
You are still supporting the Republican party… the sane one, not the other one….amirite?
"if you agree with it, please defend it and explain how white men are victimized by wokeism." Always in attack mode when you see something you don't like. Seldom a polite request for dialogue.
"what do 1619 and 1775 mean to you." Always making demands.
What do you think a “polite request for dialogue” looks like?
I said, “Please”. I asked questions. I did not insult you, nor presume what your responses would be.
I’ll ask again, with a ‘Pretty Please” this time: What do 1619 and 1776 have to do with the premises* of the article?
Do you think that white people, specifically white men, are being discriminated against by “wokeism”, as the author claims?
And as usual, you are not answering questions. But neither did David, who posted the original link to the article.
David likes to pretend that he’s all about promoting constructive dialogue, but won’t ever engage in it.
*The two premises of the article are 1) that intelligent people believe stupid things, leading up to point 2, which is that all “wokeism”, or modern progressive anti-racist ideology, is one of those “stupid things” that intelligent people believe.
It was fairly liberating for me to watch a W. Kamau Bell "United Shades" show where he discussed what "woke" really means. Like so many these days, the "Smart People / Stupid Things" writer misused "woke," in this case to try proving that certain categories of people are stupid.
Hurray! Toilets for everyone!
Proposal for non-gendered bathrooms in Colorado public buildings passes first hurdle (msn.com)
You would think it would be non-controversial but the vote on the state affairs committee was 8 to 3. The three included Skin de Graff and Scott "There Is No" Bottom.
Gendered bathrooms feel like a "it's that way because… it's just that way" thing. I have an extreme stance that it's unnecessary to have gendered bathrooms at all.
I think especially bathrooms with only 1 toilet should be ungendered bathrooms. There aren't gendered bathrooms in homes. I don't see why they need to be gendered in public.
"I think especially bathrooms with only 1 toilet should be ungendered bathrooms"
Absolutely!
And in other countries, there are communal lavatory sinks and individual toilet stalls with partitions all the way to the floor.
I realize that the enclosed toilets might put a crimp in the love life of some wide-stance conservative Republicans, but they can always look for action on Craig's List instead.
Sounds like you're bringing back the former Family Values Senator from Idaho, Larry Craig, and his "lovetapping" in a mens' room in the Minneapolis airport some years back.
Many modern public schools are already partly “ non-gendered”; the toilets have separate rooms for males and females, but in the middle is a shared long sink and mirror area for hand washing. This saves money by consolidating , rather than duplicating, “cleaning up” functions.
Anecdotally, kids spend less time primping when the opposite sex might be observing the magic happen, too.
More Than Half Of Republicans Support Christian Nationalism. From TPM.
…
"The view has been prominent in white evangelical spaces for decades"
True. I'm old enough to remember Jerry Fallwell, Sr. (father of the dude with the horny wife and the pool boy) using the phrase "Christian Republic" in the 1980's.
He dropped it because it sounded a lot like the term "Islamic Republic" which, of course, was Iran – the nation we hated but to which we sold weapons.
Christian Nationalists are also strongly opposed to non-believers like agnostics and atheists.
Lyin’ Lauren has no shame.
She is taking credit for “ securing funding” for rural community health clinics, while she spoke out against the ACA which made Medicaid expansion, thus funding these clinics.