U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
November 26, 2013 03:18 PM UTC
21 Comments
I am down for this. Let's give these conservative extremists a taste of their own medicine. People were very angry when Marble made some insensitive racist comments.
Riiiight, so when Pols put up the stuff about Scott Walker hating recalls, and all the talk about recalls being bad?
Time's must have changed I guess…
Yes dear. And your side has changed them.
Why aren't Rivera and Herpin on this list? I know they have to carry their own water next November, but if the bar for recall [10% of the last election] is applicable to "recalling the recallers], then it looks like all you'd have to gather to recall Rivera is 3,450 and 1,770 for Herpin. Do the statutory timelines provide enough time to oust them before the end of the 2014 session? Have either announced their intent to re-run in 2014?
answer: no. They must be in office 6 mos prior. By the time signatures were gathered and election held the session would be over
Thx…and I see I was using the wrong percentage. You'd need 8,639 to launch a recall on Rivera – and 4,461 to launch one on Herpin. And it looks like April 3 is the magic date for both of them given the six-month rule.
Rivera has a 2014 campaign committee with 3300 in it.
Herpin has a committee, but no money in it. Probably, that's significant.
I am hearing rumors that Hudak is going to resign if she is recalled. Has anyone else heard anything about this? I also heard that the recall people got 18,000 signatures today. Whether this is true, I don't know, but they said they are trying to get 27,000 signatures. This leads me to believe that they believe that a lot of signatures mght be thrown out.
Though I always want to contest until the end, in this instance, if they get the signatures I think it would be very considerate of Evie to resign and allow the central committee to appoint her replacement. Must keep the majority
I agree. Although I have no problem with Evie, if she is recalled, she should resign. Keeping the majority is more important than any one senator.
I haven't looked into this…when is her deadline to resign to prevent the recall going forward?
It's a bit complicated because of the petition deadline. If the recall target doesn't resign within 5 days after certification of sufficiency and the time for protest has passed, then the process of setting the election starts. However, if the person resigns before the deadline for filing successor candidate petitons "in accordance with section 1-12-117," the election is cancelled. [C.R.S. 1-12-110]
That last part ("in accordance with section 1-12-117") could be where it gets interesting. That is the petition deadline of "ten calendar days" after the election date is set that is in conflict with the Constitution and led to the past recall issues. But since the regisnation part specifically refers to 1-12-117, does that prevail? Seems unlikely it would come to that, but there in another potential lawsuit there!
For a member of the general assembly, the time period is "anytime after the fifth day following the convening and organizing of the general assembly following the election." The six months requirement applies to all other offices. [C.R.S. 1-12-102 (1)]
We need to recall all republicans.
Recall petitioners need to have valid signatures of number equal to or exceeding 1/4 of all votes cast in elected official's last election.
We need to focus on winning those two seats back in 2014. Pueblo and Morse's district both lean democratic now and we need to get a law passed that would allow mail in ballots for recall elections.
It was my understanding that the reason that mail in ballots weren't available was because of a ruling that forced the allowance of letting Libertarians petition on. They didn't make it on and by the time that happened it was decided that there was not enough time to print mail ballots. Probably a Republican trick.
So, if this is the case, then mail in ballots are allowed in recalls but probably needs some work in the area of petitioning on and deadlines for printing ballots.
There is also the possibility that my memory is failing me and I am completely wrong.
Mail in ballots are allowed, and in fact mandated. Our polling in the Pueblo recall indicated that we would win in an all mail ballot election, and that is what we were working towards until a month before the actual election.
However……if there is a third party candidate in a recall election (and Marilyn Marks, who worked with one of the recallhudaktoo organizers on a Mesa County election previously wil make sure that there is always a third party candidate petitioning on at the last minute)…then the deadlines to get the mail ballots printed, mailed, and out sitting on voter's tables won't work with the waiting period for the petitions to get done. The Colorado Constitution is very generous to people wanting to petition onto the ballot.
So basically we're screwed until there is a Colorado constitutional amendment. This is another reason why I'm not down for Dems initiating recalls. In a three way race, if majority votes for recall, then a candidate with 31% of the vote – a screwball, in fact – could win an election.
Mail ballots certainly would have helped Morse. However, as a general strategy, recall elections held as special elections are always going to be lower turnout than regular elections. Mail ballot recalls conducted as special elections will have lower turnout than regular elections (which from now on will be mail ballot). Democratic turnout is especially lower on special elections than regular elections. Recalls will always favor Republicans until Democrats get off their butts and vote in them.
Mail ballots change the dynamic of any election, and can easily be used to counter the lower turn out phenomenon of special/recall elections.
By that I mean, with a good field campaign and something like VAN, it's a heck of a lot easier to hit every Democrat in a district and say "Fill out your ballot, and I can turn it in for you" than it is to say "Please make sure you hassle yourself enough to go to a polling place and vote in person." That's why mail-in ballots are key.
I agree mail ballots change the dynamic of any election. However, special elections are always going to be a bigger challenge for Democrats than general elections, and perhaps bigger for coordinated elections as well. It is simply harder to gear up a good field campaign "to support the good guys" for a single issue than for a multiple candidate and issue election. The single issue/hate/attack side will always have the passion advantage on a recall.
It is also why I think Dem attempts to recall R's are probably not productive. Dems just would not have the passion of hate/attack/anaililate that fueled the field campaign that the gun crazys had against Morse and Giron.