UPDATE #3: House Bill 1274 fails Senate by one vote.
UPDATE #2: Ritter breaks silence, essentially says he will veto House Bill 1274 as presently written. Developing.
UPDATE: Rumors of the death penalty ban’s demise appear to have been exaggerated, breaking Denver Post:
Lawmakers this morning put a ban on the death penalty back into a bill providing funding to solve cold case murders, setting up their colleagues for politically tricky votes on the controversial topic on the final day of the session.
The House in April passed by one vote the original version of House Bill 1274, which would have ended capital punishment and used the savings to build a cold case task force within the Colorado Bureau of Investigations.
The Senate, which has not voted the death penalty up or down, earlier this week took out the death penalty ban and instead implemented a $2.50 fee on anyone convicted of a traffic, misdemeanor or felony offense to pay for grants to local police jurisdictions.
Final votes coming. Original post follows.
AP reports:
The fight over a proposal to abolish the death penalty in Colorado is going down to the wire.
State lawmakers plan to meet this morning, the final day of the legislative session, to decide whether to revive a bill that originally would have ended the death penalty and used the savings to fund a statewide cold case unit.
That bill unraveled this week in the Senate where lawmakers voted to scrap the death penalty ban and instead impose a series of new fees to fund investigations of unsolved cases.
The original bill is sponsored by Rep. Paul Weissmann, D-Boulder, and Sen. Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, both strong opponents of the death penalty. They expect the conference committee appointed by House and Senate leaders to work out the differences between the chambers will recommend putting the death penalty ban back in the bill. They think the fines to fund cold cases mainly on the local level could also be included.
“The debate isn’t over. This bill isn’t over,” Carroll said.
Liberal activist group Progress Now, one of the main proponents of House Bill 1274, sent a blast email out last night with targets to call and a strong “it isn’t over yet” message. What are the odds of reverting the bill to its original language, folks? Get your predictions in quick, we’ll know how you did in a few hours.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Boebert Goes Culture War Ambulance Chasing At The Olympics
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Boebert Goes Culture War Ambulance Chasing At The Olympics
BY: kwtree
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I hate to disagree with Carroll because I am in favor of this bill but the debate really is over and so is the bill.
And I’ll be quite happy to be proven wrong.
Only a call from the Governor will save it. I think Ritter would be happy to see this issue go away so that he has more time to waffle and equivocate.
The Post reports, in effect, that Ritter will veto the bill as crafted by the conference committee.
Is trying to figure out just how furious they are with the Governor right now. He has screwed a LOT of people in the last 48 hours, and we’ll be talking about it long after the session.
…after the conference committee released its now-doomed version? Of course, he may have been in contact with the relevant players before then.
Hickenlooper ’10
…doh! Does Ritter now wish he’d stayed silent? Or was his late public opposition to the bill necessary to gather all the “no” votes in the Senate?
Either that or it was one of the more bone-headed political moves of his term–and that’s saying a lot.
Taylormatt at Dkos has it, too, with a link to the diary here. 🙂
between the chicken and the pig in a breakfast of ham and eggs. The chicken is involved, but the pig is committed. RSB is involved but you’d have to admit, I’m committed.
Thank you very much.
You are definitely committed.
Senator Mary Hodge, Brighton
Senator Lois Tochtrop, Thornton
Senator Jim Isgar, Hesperus
Senator John Morse, Colorado Springs.
IIRC, Mary Hodge sat on the Appropriations Committee which approved the original bill on a party line. She give any reason for pulling a Bob Beauprez?
Let’s just put these pro-death Democrats on my permanent list of people I will never vote for regardless of their opposition.
Way to go out on a limb there and only stake out a real position when you absolutely had no other choice.
Honestly, if he had just come out and said, “I don’t support this, I’m going to veto it” from the outset I would have been mad, but I would have at least been left with a modicum of respect for the man.
Ritter right now has two things he can tout: New Energy Economy, and FASTER. That’s about it. He may get lucky and the economy may be in full-on recovery by the time November 2010 rolls around, which could be the only thing saving him from being run out of office by Democrats, Republicans and independents.
One thing is going to be certain in 2010: Democrats are not going to be excited. Neither Bennet nor Ritter are generating much of anything past lukewarm, polite acceptance.
Republican activists, on the other hand, are going to be out in force. They’re candidates suck, but in retrospect, didn’t Ritter kind of suck in 2006?