U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 20, 2013 08:19 PM UTC
58 Comments
This mailing is hitting Mesa County Clerk Sheila Reiner on her support for House Bill 1303, the 
This is of course the electorate that elected Jard Wright–who likes to tweet links to InfoWars.com as source material to 'back up' his wingnuttery. Ray "API' Scott, and Steve '80s' King. It will probably work there, it is low-info voter land where all you need is a T after your name to get elected.
Everyone in the picture is white. Is that on purpose?
probably…
Yes. No 'probably.' This is total slimeball politics, brought to us by Mr. Gessler's ilk.
I'm sure you are right, CT. I was being generous. Gessler is setting the slime bar higher and higher. That trend must reflect his political ambitions.
He has so many heroes to emulate…Rove, DeLay, Cheney, Rumsfelt, DeMint, etc. He must be trying to earn a place among the big players.
Yes it is on purpose, because I just found the original image, which appears to be from the WaPo, and THEY PHOTOSHOPPED OUT THE BLACK PERSON. Oh my God.
As you can see, I'm not making it up. The woman in the gray hoodie in the center of the picture was originally African-American, BUT THEY PHOTOSHOPPED THE WHITE WOMAN NEXT TO HER OVER HER FACE.
I looked at this image this morning and saw that it looked funny. Then I simply Googled "voting line" and found the original in about a minute.
Holy shit these people are dirty.
You were absolutely right, CT. This is despicable…but not surprising.
And the black guy above her head. Cheap job – you can see the smear where they removed his head.
Gotta pad those invoices somehow…cheap work premium price is my guess. The Karl Rove School of Campaign Spending…
Look behind the women, the original has a tall man with blue hood; he is gone in the flyer. You also missed 2 people that are in both pictures, the person with black long coat and black hat standing behind bald kid and the black hooded lady standing behind fat gal with green jacket.
So both pictures have people of all races yet it appears 1 or both pictures have been altered.
Regarding same address as Gessler, there are other employees and lawyers in that office, such as Mario Nikolais who have the right to politic. I am sure Gassler allows them to use the business address…
Its right in front of your face Nockers. Not surprised you deny it. Reince should use that $10 million to educate his own base. Outreach is pointless with bullshit lke this. Wait until it goes national, and this will. Mr. Gessler will be doing some spinning…
And it's the face of the woman next to her when you look close. So a very lazy photoshop effort.
And… The picture is from this article. So they pulled a picture not from Colorado but from Virginia (shades of Scott McInnis' use of Mt. Denali).
And the article is about 3 hour lines due to a voting system that seemed purposefully designed to discourage voting. It's like they're trying to sell the benefits of requiring long waits at polling places.
And another interesting question – did they buy use rights from Mark Wilson/Getty Images? If not, they stole the picture.
I'm guessing not. I hope whatever media decides to cover this they pursue that lead too.
Amazing. And no one can offer a substitute "explanation" for why this was done.
Well done.
Well, according to the Wiki, the black population of Mesa County is "0.46% " So, I think they were just adjusting the photo to reflect the makeup of Mesa voters. The partial face of the black man behind the bald male is the 1/2%.
Apparently there were not enough twins in the photo to be reflective of the population…
h/t to Ralphie?
JDB's Facebook page broke this ten hours prior.
Thanks for noticing, Daft. This morning I also posted the flier that's been going to La Plata county.
Ralphie! Yo…
Come back more often Ralphie!
Welcome back! We knew you couldn't quit us.
Hi Ralphie!
Good on ya, mate!
Our original source for the mailer .PDF didn't tell us where they got it from, but we're happy to give credit where due. JDB also supplied the the La Plata County mailer we're linking to at the top of this post now, so thanks for that as well.
It looks like all of us missed the Photoshopping African-Americans out of the photo, which the commenter known as "bullshit!" pointed out this morning. That could well turn out to be the biggest story of all.
Are there any GOTP candidates out there who are not convicted felons? I mean not counting the ones who DUI with guns.
The city councilman has not been convicted, yet.
I believe the representative technically resigned under duress from his last job as a public employee (alledgedly) grafting tax dollars.
It was never proven conclusively that Craig Meis actually tried to use his office to avoid the accountability to law and rules the rest of us 'little people' regularly must comply with.
Is plagarism really a crime? Highly unethical–yes, felony, no. Of course, breach of contract is a civil matter. But he gave the money back, eventually, after throwing Rolly under the bus–also only dispicable and shameful, but not a crime.
Hope that clears it up. Its a fine bunch of elected officals over there in Mesa County.
Well- ok, then the answer – there are plenty of un-convicted candidates.
Spank my butt and call me pinky. I would not have thunk it.
I guess racist pig is another term to attach to our fine Person-of-State (POS)'s former law firm, the same one he wanted to keep moonlighting for?
The lawyers at Gessler's former law firm may or may not be racist, but they sure thinks that their fellow Republicans are! (and who would know better?)
As far as I see it–this level of cynicism to manipulate your fearful, xenophobic base is racist. No one can discern intent inside a person's head–we have to judge by word and action. By, the fruit it bears a tree is known and all that. I stand by my analysis.
Free and Fair Elections are only for white, "Christian" right wing/tea party types that don't want anyone that disagrees with them to have a free and fair election. Right? Right!
I want to take a second to congratulate the county clerks. They've clearly focused on improving the voting process for all instead of using it for partisian advantage. They are all owed a major thank you from all of us for doing their job well.
Agree. During my time here as an active Dem, have never had a problem of suspicious goings on in Arapahoe County because of a GOP County Clerk. Overwhelmingly, our state's County Clerks have been devoted to fairness rather than partisanship in overseeing elections, unlike our sleazy SOS.
No wonder he's targeting them. He must think that their mere existence makes him look even worse by comparison. Gessler needn't worry about that. He couldn't look any worse short of the dead girl, live little boy scenario.
I want to take a second to congratulate Daft Punk. This is shameful and it would be nice if the so-called MSM covered it.
The Grand Junction Sentinel covered it, but I'm not holding my breath about the Denver paper.
The media should report that the photo was intentionally altered to remove African-Americans. It is dispicable, it shows how deserate Mr. Gessler and his ilk are, and it shows how hopeless Reince's $10 million outreach will be. Most of all it is very troubling and cockroaches run from light (I grew up in the SOuth and spent some time in GJ smashing 'waterbugs'). Shine it on their sorry crawling selves.
Or rather…to congratulate Bullshit! Good work. This story has legs.
If this legislation is a Dem plot to to overpower GOP voters with felons, dead people etc. why does it have so much support among Republican County Clerks? ArapG? Anyone? Care to explain? Are all those R clerks really RINOs who hate America and freedom and stuff?
Don't worry, EF will be along shorty to argue that you can't prove the photo was photoshopped. It could have been altered with GIMP or other image software. Therefore, everything you say is wrong.
In nifty Latin legal terms, too.
I doubt even EF could find a way to defend this one. It's too stupid, too blatant, to racist for him to dare. He knows he'd be pounded into pretentious, self-important jelly in such an argument, so he wouldn't engage.
Guppy, on the other hand, is just waiting for everyone to go to sleep before he posts.
There's always the old no matter what no one knows what's in their hearts argument. I've heard that one from EF. You know…. just because it looks like a racist and talks like a racist and walks like a racist, you still can't know if it has a racist heart. Guess that would require surgery. Or maybe just going through airport security.
Why, even the deceased could vote! Hey, don't knock it, that's what elected Jack Kennedy. Actually the religious right Republicans should be in favor of letting the deceased vote. They seem inordinately preoccupied with the hereafter, so why not enfranchise the dead?
And don't forget votes for the pre-born!
I agree with everything folks say except for one thing. The Hackstaff Law Firm is a political law firm. They represent lots of political groups. Lawyers are often the registered agent for their clients. I'm personally the registered agent for over 100 entities here in Colorado. If you blamed me for everything my clients did, well, I'd be in a heap of trouble. I make my money by getting my clients out of trouble when they are already in trouble. The fact that a Republican PAC is registered at the Hackstaff firm doesn't mean that the firm itself, or for that matter, Gessler knew anything about this mailer.
Someone ought to do some research to see what this PAC is and who is behind it. Who gave it money? Who are the people controlling the PAC? What do we know about it? These may lead you back to Gessler or perhaps even Hackstaff, though I have my doubts. The same address means nothing. Every law firm in town that deals with business probably has some entity for which its address is used as the registered agent for a Colorado entity.
Why do we do it you might ask? It's simple. It helps lawyers keep in contact with clients and perhaps generate more business. It's all about the money. I even give this service away for free.
Good point. Be sure to tell Glenn Beck to roll this into his Benghazi-Boston conspiracy theory cry-fest tomorrow.
Thanks, Craig. it's always nice to have someone arounf d who knows what they're talking about to keep us grounded.
That would be "around" with no fs.
With all due respect, I think that goes with the territory of being the agent for a political group. That's not exactly an everyday problem. Sorry, bub.
I agree Jeffco. Gessler's old firm's address is the principal street address for the entity. It is not just that the firm is the registered agent. I don't think Hackstaff or Nicolais prepared the flyer or photoshopped the people of color. I also understand that political groups that mail this type of crap like to hide behind a wall of lawyers to protect their identity. But, it still looks bad for Gessler by association.
Thanks for the voice of reason. There is no evidence that Gessler had any involvement, or that his former law firm is responsible for anything more than providing a mailing address. Pols shoots from the hip wrongly once again.
And once again The Bot swings by to stake his ground representing the party of personal non-responsibility and perpetual mean-liberal victimhood. Why, bot, does this random entity think your base is so scared of non-whites that a terribly apparent PhotoShop job was in order? How's Reince's outreach going?
ProgressNow Calls on Gessler to "Condemn Racist Attack Mailers Against GOP Clerks"
Wouldn't advise any breath holding. More likely attacks on "desperate" Ds making mountains out of molehills. See. We don't even need ArapG's input.
So I wonder if the dirty dark money shop that put this smear piece together is 1) paying for this image from Getty Images and 2) if they have permission to alter it from the copyright holder.
People wait in line to vote at Caroline High School on November 6, 2012 in Milford, Virginia.
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Getty lisc info
So, how does that work–say the dar money shop didn't bother to either or both above? Can Hackstaff claim it is just a client service if actual misdeeds, not just skullduggery, were done?